Études sur la "religion civile": J.-J. Rousseau contre Saint-Simon dans la formation d'Émile Durkheim
Durkheim rejected the theory of the contract as an expression of English individualism and the naturalism of political economy. In Rousseau's social contract, society again appears as a ‘mechanism’, made up of single individuals, and not as a true ‘organism’, in the pre- or sovra-individual mea...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Français |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Ed. Dehoniane
2001
|
| Dans: |
Annali di storia dell'esegesi
Année: 2001, Volume: 18, Numéro: 2, Pages: 637-656 |
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques 1712-1778
/ Saint-Simon, Henri de 1760-1825
/ Durkheim, Émile 1858-1917
/ Religion civile
|
| RelBib Classification: | AD Sociologie des religions |
| Résumé: | Durkheim rejected the theory of the contract as an expression of English individualism and the naturalism of political economy. In Rousseau's social contract, society again appears as a ‘mechanism’, made up of single individuals, and not as a true ‘organism’, in the pre- or sovra-individual meaning that Durkheim had acquired from German sociology. On the other hand, in Rousseau Durkheim found a theory of the social order understood as something that did not derive from nature, but from efforts made in the direction of civilisation and morality. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1120-4001 |
| Contient: | In: Annali di storia dell'esegesi
|