“But Me No Buts”: The Theological Debate Between the Hasidim and the Mitnagdim in Light of the Discourse-Markers Theory
The linguistic theory of discourse markers may often help us to decipher the roots of theological controversies in traditional cultures, where both of the parties declare loyalty to the same doctrines. According to this theory, if two sentences are coupled by “but,” the conjunction bears the implica...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2014
|
In: |
Numen
Year: 2014, Volume: 61, Issue: 5/6, Pages: 525-551 |
Further subjects: | B
Hasidism
Hasidim
Mitnagdim
monism
but
salience
tradition
discourse markers
discourse connectives
conventional implicature
pragmatics
Kabbalah
Jewish thought
theology
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1490470816 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220602110352.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 141204s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/15685276-12341341 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1490470816 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)420470816 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ420470816 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Brown, Benjamin |4 aut | |
109 | |a Brown, Benjamin |a Brown, Ben | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a “But Me No Buts”: The Theological Debate Between the Hasidim and the Mitnagdim in Light of the Discourse-Markers Theory |
264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The linguistic theory of discourse markers may often help us to decipher the roots of theological controversies in traditional cultures, where both of the parties declare loyalty to the same doctrines. According to this theory, if two sentences are coupled by “but,” the conjunction bears the implicature that the statement that comes after the “but” is the one that the speaker wishes to emphasize, or grant salience over the statement that comes before it. Examined on the theological texts of the Hasidim and the Mitnagdim, the theory is proved useful: for the Hasidim, statements on the Simple Unity of God are placed after “but,” while the Mitnagdim place statements on the multiplicity in which it appears in our world. | ||
601 | |a Theologe | ||
650 | 4 | |a Hasidism |x Hasidim |x Mitnagdim |x monism |x but |x salience |x tradition |x discourse markers |x discourse connectives |x conventional implicature |x pragmatics |x Kabbalah |x Jewish thought |x theology | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Numen |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1954 |g 61(2014), 5/6, Seite 525-551 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)326977325 |w (DE-600)2041938-7 |w (DE-576)094145105 |x 1568-5276 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:61 |g year:2014 |g number:5/6 |g pages:525-551 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685276-12341341 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2824243813 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1490470816 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20141204120531 | ||
LOK | |0 008 141204||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-21-31 |c DE-627 |d DE-21-31 | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-21-31 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |c Ze 181-61,5.6 |m p |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs | ||
LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2831884535 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1490470816 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20170808151825 | ||
LOK | |0 008 150130||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |