“The Philosophical Thesis of the Identity of Thinking and Being is Just the Opposite of What it seems to be.”: Kierkegaard on the Relations between Being and Thought
Kierkegaard is often regarded as an opponent of metaphysics per se. However, he not only implicitly espouses metaphysical positions, but also his understanding of existence rests upon an explicit metaphysical differentiation between being qua actuality and being qua thought, which results in a diffe...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2015
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
Year: 2015, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: 13-30 |
| RelBib Classification: | TJ Modern history VA Philosophy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1532660790 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604110332.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160321r20152015xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/kierke-2015-0103 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1532660790 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)462660796 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ462660796 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-B1597)kierke-2015-0103 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a da Silva, Gabriel Ferreira |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 5 | |a “The Philosophical Thesis of the Identity of Thinking and Being is Just the Opposite of What it seems to be.” |b Kierkegaard on the Relations between Being and Thought |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Kierkegaard is often regarded as an opponent of metaphysics per se. However, he not only implicitly espouses metaphysical positions, but also his understanding of existence rests upon an explicit metaphysical differentiation between being qua actuality and being qua thought, which results in a difference between actuality (Virkelighed) and reality (Realitet). I begin by analyzing an apparent contradiction between two of Kierkegaard’s statements on the relations between being and thought, which leads me both to inquire into that distinction and to retrace the roots of Kierkegaard’s account. Finally, I present Kierkegaard’s final positions and point out some of their existential consequences | ||
| 534 | |c 2015 | ||
| 601 | |a Philosophie | ||
| 601 | |a Opposition | ||
| 652 | |a TJ:VA | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1996 |g 20(2015), 1, Seite 13-30 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)369083393 |w (DE-600)2118444-6 |w (DE-576)107015773 |x 1612-9792 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:13-30 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2015-0103 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2903676593 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1532660790 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180912121706 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160321||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a gruy | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053909 |a TJ | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||