Climacus and the Arguments for God’s Existence
This article offers an evaluation of Climacus’ objections to the arguments for the existence of God. With one exception (the critique of the ontological argument, which seems to anticipate the contemporary logico-empiricist position), these objections are found wanting. In the first general objectio...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2015
|
| In: |
Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook
Year: 2015, Volume: 20, Issue: 1, Pages: 55-78 |
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NBC Doctrine of God TJ Modern history |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1532660812 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604110332.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160321r20152015xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/kierke-2015-0105 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1532660812 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)462660818 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ462660818 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-B1597)kierke-2015-0105 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Teodorescu, Valentin |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Teodorescu, Valentin | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Climacus and the Arguments for God’s Existence |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article offers an evaluation of Climacus’ objections to the arguments for the existence of God. With one exception (the critique of the ontological argument, which seems to anticipate the contemporary logico-empiricist position), these objections are found wanting. In the first general objection, Climacus seems to jump illegitimately from the objective reality of God’s existence (or non-existence) to the subjective conviction about God’s existence (or nonexistence). In the second, one might find exceptions to Climacus’ assertion that one can never deduce the existence of persons from the facts of the palpable world. Next, the objection against the teleological argument is inconclusive, since, in my opinion, Climacus does not offer a clear structure to-or critique of-this argument. Lastly, the ethico-religious objection fails because God’s existence- even if one would accept the reality of a sensus divinitatis-is not yet transparently evident to us. Nonetheless, in Climacus’ treatment of all these objections we observe similarities with certain ideas of contemporary reformed epistemology: a skepticism with regard to natural theology, a belief in a sensus divinitatis, and a positive assessment of the role of faith as an epistemological presupposition. | ||
| 534 | |c 2015 | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 652 | |a AB:NBC:TJ | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Kierkegaard studies. Yearbook |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1996 |g 20(2015), 1, Seite 55-78 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)369083393 |w (DE-600)2118444-6 |w (DE-576)107015773 |x 1612-9792 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:20 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:55-78 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/kierke-2015-0105 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2903676615 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1532660812 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180912130130 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160321||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a gruy | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442051507 |a NBC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053909 |a TJ | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||