Response to Ranganathan
This essay responds to Bharat Ranganathan's “Comment” on my essay, “The Concept of Dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (2011). Addressing key criticisms in this “Comment,” I make the following points. First, neither the idea of inherent dignity being “imparted” to humans, nor...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Wiley
[2014]
|
In: |
Journal of religious ethics
Year: 2014, Volume: 42, Issue: 4, Pages: 776-782 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Human rights
/ Human dignity
/ Religion
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NCC Social ethics VA Philosophy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1539768775 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20170419180018.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 160519s2014 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1111/jore.12082 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1539768775 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)469768770 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ469768770 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)123714559 |0 (DE-627)082724164 |0 (DE-576)293840776 |4 aut |a Hughes, Glenn |d 1951- | |
109 | |a Hughes, Glenn 1951- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Response to Ranganathan |c Glenn Hughes |
264 | 1 | |c [2014] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This essay responds to Bharat Ranganathan's “Comment” on my essay, “The Concept of Dignity in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights” (2011). Addressing key criticisms in this “Comment,” I make the following points. First, neither the idea of inherent dignity being “imparted” to humans, nor the Universal Declaration's implication—through its use of terms such as “inherent” and “inalienable”—that humans participate in transcendent reality, necessarily presuppose a Christian metaphysics. Second, a concept such as “inherent dignity” must be affirmed to be intrinsically heuristic unless we are to assume that its meaning can be completely known within the conditions of existence; but this affirmation does not render such concepts “indeterminate of sense.” Finally, Ranganathan's distinction between“weak” and “strong” senses of transcendence is untenable. If human truths beyond all contingencies are knowable (“weak” transcendence), then there must be a real dimension of meaning that transcends all contingencies (“strong” transcendence). | ||
652 | |a AB:NCC:VA | ||
689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4074725-6 |0 (DE-627)106088556 |0 (DE-576)209195088 |2 gnd |a Menschenrecht |
689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4038654-5 |0 (DE-627)106231219 |0 (DE-576)209031360 |2 gnd |a Menschenwürde |
689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4049396-9 |0 (DE-627)106187155 |0 (DE-576)209081880 |2 gnd |a Religion |
689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of religious ethics |d Hoboken, NJ : Wiley, 1973 |g 42(2014), 4, Seite 776-782 |w (DE-627)129432709 |w (DE-600)193054-0 |w (DE-576)014804743 |x 0384-9694 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:42 |g year:2014 |g number:4 |g pages:776-782 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n elektronische Ausgabe |w (DE-627)1822388724 |k Electronic | ||
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Ranganathan, Bharat |t Should inherent human dignity be considered intrinsically heuristic? |d 2014 |w (DE-627)1539768058 |w (DE-576)469768053 |
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik von |a Hughes, Glenn, 1951 - |t The concept of dignity in the universal declaration of human rights |d 2011 |w (DE-627)1536971871 |w (DE-576)466971877 |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1111/jore.12082 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2925128467 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1539768775 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20160825120735 | ||
LOK | |0 008 160519||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144205283X |a NCC | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053844 |a VA | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
STA | 0 | 0 | |a Human dignity,Human dignity,Human rights,Human rights,Religion,Religion in literature,Religions,Religion |
STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dignité humaine,Dignité humaine,Droit de l’homme,Droitsde l’homme,Droit humain,Droit humain,Droits de l'homme (droit international),Droit humain (motif),Droit humain,Religion,Religions,Religion |
STC | 0 | 0 | |a Derechos Humanos,Derechos Humanos,Dignidad humana,Dignidad humana,Religión,Religión,Religión |
STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dignità dell'essere umano,Dignità dell'essere umano,Diritti umani <motivo>,Diritti umani,Diritti dell'uomo,Diritti dell'uomo,Diritti dell'uomo (motivo),Diritti dell'uomo,Religione,Religione,Religione |
STE | 0 | 0 | |a 人权,人的尊严,人的尊严,人格尊严,人性尊严,人格尊严,人性尊严,宗教,宗教 |
STF | 0 | 0 | |a 人權,人的尊嚴,人的尊嚴,人格尊嚴,人性尊嚴,人格尊嚴,人性尊嚴,宗教,宗教 |
STG | 0 | 0 | |a Dignidade humana,Dignidade humana,Direitos Humanos,Direitos Humanos,Religião,Religião |
STH | 0 | 0 | |a Права человека (мотив),Права человека,Религия,Религия (мотив),Человеческое достоинство (мотив),Человеческое достоинство |
STI | 0 | 0 | |a Ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα <μοτίβο>,Ανθρώπινα δικαιώματα,Δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου,Δικαιώματα του ανθρώπου (μοτίβο),Ανθρώπινη αξιοπρέπεια <μοτίβο>,Ανθρώπινη αξιοπρέπεια,Αξιοπρέπεια του ανθρώπου,Αξιοπρέπεια του ανθρώπου (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία,Θρησκεία (μοτίβο) |
SUB | |a REL | ||
SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Menschenrechte,Menschenrechte , Religion,Mystik,Mythologie |