When the thin small voice whispers: Richard Kearney’s Anatheism and the postsecular discernment of spirits
What meaning does the theological notion of discernment have in a postsecular cultural condition? Three levels of the meaning of postsecular are distinguished: first, the ‘postsecular’, as a notion that characterises a cultural condition, mainly in Western society, full of diverse religious expressi...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic/Print Review |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Taylor & Francis
[2015]
|
In: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
Year: 2015, Volume: 76, Issue: 2, Pages: 149-162 |
Review of: | Anatheism (New York [u.a.] : Columbia Univ. Press, 2010) (Hettema, Theo L.)
|
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Kearney, Richard 1954-
/ Post-secularism
/ Discernment of spirits
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism NAA Systematic theology |
Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
Summary: | What meaning does the theological notion of discernment have in a postsecular cultural condition? Three levels of the meaning of postsecular are distinguished: first, the ‘postsecular’, as a notion that characterises a cultural condition, mainly in Western society, full of diverse religious expressions; second, ‘postsecularity’, as a reflective model for interpreting religious expressions and behaviour; and third, ‘postsecularism’, as a cultural-philosophical or theological programme. After elucidating the concept of the postsecular, we consider some key elements in discernment, investigating the subject, the nature and the object of discernment. We then turn to Richard Kearney’s Anatheism as a fine example of how the notion of discernment receives a new usage in postsecular reflection. We ponder upon his idea of discernment as ‘prereflective carnal response to the advent of the Other’ and reflect upon its meaning for postsecular thinking. The concluding section offers a consideration of the meaning of Kearney’s interpretation of discernment for judgement in postsecular culture. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2015.1046905 |