Grube on justified religious difference
This paper is a response to Dirk-Martin Grube’s article elsewhere in this issue. After discussing the points on which I agree with Grube, I explain why his notion of bivalence has not yet received the accuracy it needs.
| Publié dans: | International journal of philosophy and theology |
|---|---|
| Auteur principal: | |
| Type de support: | Numérique/imprimé Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Taylor & Francis
[2016]
|
| Dans: |
International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés: | B
Pluralisme religieux
/ Tolérance religieuse
/ Bivalence
|
| RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophie de la religion AX Dialogue interreligieux |
| Accès en ligne: |
Accès probablement gratuit Volltext (doi) |
| Résumé: | This paper is a response to Dirk-Martin Grube’s article elsewhere in this issue. After discussing the points on which I agree with Grube, I explain why his notion of bivalence has not yet received the accuracy it needs. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2169-2327 |
| Référence: | Kritik von "Justified religious difference (2016)"
Kritik in "Reply to the respondents to "Justified religious difference: a constructive approach to religious diversity" (2016)" |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: International journal of philosophy and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/21692327.2016.1140589 |