What happened to Kemosh?
What happened to Kemosh in the era after Moab’s loss of political independence? The present article first argues that this question is of interest to scholarship on the Hebrew Bible because Kemosh and Yhwh were initially twinlike: both were patron deities of Iron Age Levantine kingdoms and shared va...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
De Gruyter
2016
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft
Year: 2016, Volume: 128, Issue: 2, Pages: 284-299 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Jahwe
/ Moabite
/ God
|
| RelBib Classification: | HB Old Testament TC Pre-Christian history ; Ancient Near East |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a2200000 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1546235027 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604125342.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 160817r20162016xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1515/zaw-2016-0020 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1546235027 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)476235022 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ476235022 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-B1597)zaw-2016-0020 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)116635556X |0 (DE-627)1030387656 |0 (DE-576)510735231 |4 aut |a Cornell, Collin |d 1988- | |
| 109 | |a Cornell, Collin 1988- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a What happened to Kemosh? |c Collin Cornell |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a What happened to Kemosh in the era after Moab’s loss of political independence? The present article first argues that this question is of interest to scholarship on the Hebrew Bible because Kemosh and Yhwh were initially twinlike: both were patron deities of Iron Age Levantine kingdoms and shared various similarities of profile. As such, comparing the postnational history of Kemosh and Yhwh can help to isolate the historical and intellectual events without which Yhwh would presumably have developed along similar lines to Kemosh. This article next argues that both deities underwent »the Greek interpretation« by becoming identified with their equivalent in the Greek pantheon. But unlike Kemosh, Yhwh’s evolution included a counterbalancing force, i.e. inscripturation. Because prophetic oracles and regional stories about Kemosh were never gathered into an authoritative corpus, Kemosh became the Greek god Ares, without remainder. | ||
| 520 | |a Qu’est-il advenu de Kemosh suite à la perte d’autonomie politique de Moab? Cet article défend d’abord la pertinence de cette question pour la recherche biblique, car Kemosh et Yhwh sont à l’origine comme des jumeaux: tous deux sont des divinités d’un royaume du Levant à l’âge du fer et partagent différents points communs. De ce point de vue, la comparaison des destinées post-nationales de Kemosh et de Yhwh permet d’isoler les événements historiques et intellectuels sans lesquels Yhwh aurait probablement connu la même destinée que Kemosh. Cet article cherche à montrer que les deux divinités ont subi une interpretatio graeca par une assimilation avec leur correspondant dans le panthéon grec. Cependant à l’inverse de Kemosh, l’évolution de Yhwh contenait une force de résistance, à savoir, la mise par écrit. Kemosh est simplement devenu le dieu grec Ares parce que les oracles prophétiques et les récits régionaux le concernant n’ont jamais été rassemblés dans un corpus autoritatif. | ||
| 520 | |a Was geschah mit Kemosch in der Zeit nach Moabs Verlust seiner politischen Unabhängigkeit? Der vorliegende Artikel verdeutlicht zunächst, dass diese Frage relevant für die Erforschung der Hebräischen Bibel ist, weil Kemosch und Jhwh einander ursprünglich sehr ähnlich waren: Beide waren Schutzgottheiten eisenzeitlicher Königreiche in der Levante und wiesen ein ähnliches Profil auf. Deshalb kann die nachstaatliche Geschichte von Kemosch und Jhwh dazu beitragen, die historischen und intellektuellen Ereignisse herauszuarbeiten, ohne die Jhwh sich vermutlich ähnlich entwickelt hätte wie Kemosch: Beide Gottheiten haben eine interpretatio graeca erfahrenen. Anders als Kemosch durchlief Jhwh mit der Verschriftlichung aber noch eine andere Entwicklung, die der interpretatio graeca entgegenwirkte. Weil prophetische Orakel und regionale Geschichten über Kemosch nie in einem autoritativen Korpus gesammelt wurden, ging Kemosch restlos in dem griechischen Gott Ares auf. | ||
| 534 | |c 2016 | ||
| 652 | |a HB:TC | ||
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d p |0 (DE-588)118556703 |0 (DE-627)694791792 |0 (DE-576)208977023 |2 gnd |a Jahwe |
| 689 | 0 | 1 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4241206-7 |0 (DE-627)104764171 |0 (DE-576)210436190 |2 gnd |a Moabiter |
| 689 | 0 | 2 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4021662-7 |0 (DE-627)104649747 |0 (DE-576)208939261 |2 gnd |a Gott |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Zeitschrift für die alttestamentliche Wissenschaft |d Berlin [u.a.] : De Gruyter, 1881 |g 128(2016), 2, Seite 284-299 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)330064169 |w (DE-600)2049660-6 |w (DE-576)09453330X |x 1613-0103 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:128 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:284-299 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/zaw-2016-0020 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo |a BIIN | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 128 |j 2016 |e 2 |h 284-299 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| BIB | |a 1 | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2937002463 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1546235027 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20180425092823 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 160817||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a gruy | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442053569 |a TC | ||
| LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442044128 |a HB | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4001195607 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1546235027 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20211110114114 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 211110||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135-1 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135-1 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |m p |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 2 |b www |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 85640 |u https://bibsearch.uibk.ac.at/permalink/f/1po5meu/UIB_alma51225396520003333 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a inzs | ||
| LOK | |0 938 |k p | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a God,God,Moabite |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Dieu,Dieu,Moabites |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Dios,Dios,Moabitas |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Dio,Dio,Moabiti |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 神,神,上帝,上帝 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 神,神,上帝,上帝 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Deus,Deus,Moabitas |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Бог (мотив),Бог,Моавитяне |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Θεός (μοτίβο),Θεός,Μωαβίτες |
| SUB | |a BIB |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Jahve,Jehova,Jhwh,Yahwe,YHWH , Elohim , Moabita , Playing God |