Canon Fodder
This brief review of The Norton Anthology of World Religions uses the anthology as an occasion to consider the poststructuralist analytical offerings of what came to be known as the canon wars in literary studies, suggesting that the academic field of religious studies would be well-served to engage...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Review |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2016
|
| In: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Jahr: 2016, Band: 28, Heft: 3, Seiten: 297-306 |
| Rezension von: | The Norton anthology of world religions (New York [u.a.] : Norton, 20XX) (Simmons, Merinda)
|
| normierte Schlagwort(-folgen): | B
Religion
/ Unterricht
/ Literatur
/ Kanon
|
| RelBib Classification: | AA Religionswissenschaft AH Religionspädagogik BG Weltreligionen |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Rezension
B canon wars The Norton Anthology of World Religions literary studies religious studies poststructuralism |
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This brief review of The Norton Anthology of World Religions uses the anthology as an occasion to consider the poststructuralist analytical offerings of what came to be known as the canon wars in literary studies, suggesting that the academic field of religious studies would be well-served to engage in its own canon wars. Doing so would begin to deconstruct in productive ways the protectionist and/or descriptive stance too many scholars of religion have in relation to their objects of study. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Enthält: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341379 |