The aesthetic turn
This paper considers alternative styles of philosophy, based on art or science, through an investigation of Rudolf Carnap and Martin Heidegger. Carnap’s criticism of Heidegger’s account of das Nichts is analysed in relation to Immanuel Kant’s theory of the imagination. Heidegger’s account of the wor...
Published in: | Approaching religion |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
[publisher not identified]
[2016]
|
In: |
Approaching religion
|
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Heidegger, Martin 1889-1976
/ Carnap, Rudolf 1891-1970
/ Nothing
/ Aesthetics
/ Kant, Immanuel 1724-1804
|
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism VA Philosophy |
Further subjects: | B
Heidegger
B Loos B Architecture B Imagination B Tillich B Religion B Perception B Style B Philosophy B Kant |
Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Summary: | This paper considers alternative styles of philosophy, based on art or science, through an investigation of Rudolf Carnap and Martin Heidegger. Carnap’s criticism of Heidegger’s account of das Nichts is analysed in relation to Immanuel Kant’s theory of the imagination. Heidegger’s account of the work of art demonstrates philosophies that take science as their model, over-emphasize cognition, and do not adequately consider the importance of apprehension. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1799-3121 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Approaching religion
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.30664/ar.67586 |