Skeptical theism is incompatible with theodicy
Inductive arguments from evil claim that evil presents evidence against the existence of God. Skeptical theists hold that some such arguments from evil evince undue confidence in our familiarity with the sphere of possible goods and the entailments that obtain between that sphere and God's perm...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2015
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 77, Issue: 1, Pages: 53-63 |
| Further subjects: | B
Inductive argument from evil
B Theism B Epistemology B God Proof B GOOD & evil B Theodicy B Religious Aspects B Skeptical theism B Research B THEISTS |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1559173815 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230125170118.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170531s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9494-x |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1559173815 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)489173810 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ489173810 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Coley, Scott |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Skeptical theism is incompatible with theodicy |c Scott Coley |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Inductive arguments from evil claim that evil presents evidence against the existence of God. Skeptical theists hold that some such arguments from evil evince undue confidence in our familiarity with the sphere of possible goods and the entailments that obtain between that sphere and God's permission of evil(s). I argue that the skeptical theist's skepticism on this point is inconsistent with affirming the truth of a given theodicy. Since the skeptical theist's skepticism is best understood dialogically, I'll begin by sketching the kind of argument against which the skeptical theist's skepticism is pitched. I will then define 'skeptical theistic skepticism', offer a precise definition of 'theodicy', and proceed with my argument. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Epistemology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God |x Proof | |
| 650 | 4 | |a GOOD & evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Inductive argument from evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Religious Aspects | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Research | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Skeptical theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a THEISTS | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theodicy | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 77(2015), 1, Seite 53-63 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:77 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:53-63 |
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/COLSTI.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9494-x |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2970525844 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1559173815 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170531115651 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170531||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||