Ivan Karamazov is a hopeless romantic

Ivan Karamazov is frequently used, and misused, in discussions concerning the problem of evil. The purpose of this article is to correct some pervasive misinterpretations of Ivan's statement, as found in Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov. I criticise some common misinterpretations, as ex...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:International journal for philosophy of religion
Auteur principal: Betenson, Toby (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2015
Dans: International journal for philosophy of religion
Sujets non-standardisés:B GOOD & evil
B KARAMAZOV, Ivan (Fictitious character)
B Research
B Romantic
B John Hick
B Marilyn Adams
B Positivism
B BROTHERS Karamazov, The (Book : Dostoyevsky)
B Dostoevsky
B Romanticism
B Theodicy
B Positivist
B Ivan Karamazov
B Stewart Sutherland
B The problem of evil
Accès en ligne: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Résumé:Ivan Karamazov is frequently used, and misused, in discussions concerning the problem of evil. The purpose of this article is to correct some pervasive misinterpretations of Ivan's statement, as found in Dostoevsky's The Brothers Karamazov. I criticise some common misinterpretations, as exemplified in the theodical work of Marilyn Adams and John Hick, as well as the more nuanced interpretation of Stewart Sutherland. Though Sutherland's interpretation is the strongest, it nevertheless misses the mark in identifying Ivan as a positivist. I argue that Ivan Karamazov is not a positivist, but a romantic, and a hopeless one at that. We should, therefore, not read Ivan as stating an argument for the non-existence of God, but instead see him as a representative of a very particular and robust form of non-cognitive atheism.
ISSN:1572-8684
Contient:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-014-9487-9