A simpler free will defence
Otte (Philos Phenomenol 78(1):165-177, ) and Pruss (Faith Philos 29(4):400-415, ) have produced counterexamples to Plantinga's (The nature of necessity, ) famous free will defence against the logical version of the problem of evil. The target of this criticism is the possibility of universal tr...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2015
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 77, Issue: 3, Pages: 197-203 |
| Further subjects: | B
Free Will
B FREE will & determinism B Free Will Defence B GOOD & evil B Libertarianism B Plantinga, Alvin B problem of evil B God B Necessity (Philosophy) |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 155917563X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230125170002.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170531s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-015-9512-7 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)155917563X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)489175635 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ489175635 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Bernstein, C'Zar |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 2 | |a A simpler free will defence |c C'Zar Bernstein |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Otte (Philos Phenomenol 78(1):165-177, ) and Pruss (Faith Philos 29(4):400-415, ) have produced counterexamples to Plantinga's (The nature of necessity, ) famous free will defence against the logical version of the problem of evil. The target of this criticism is the possibility of universal transworld depravity, which is crucial to Plantinga's defence. In this paper, we argue that there is a simpler and more plausible free will defence that does not require the possibility of universal transworld depravity or the truth of counterfactuals of creaturely freedom. We assume only (a) that libertarianism is possibly true and (b) that God's existence is consistent with the existence of free agents who never go wrong. We conclude the paper by explaining how our defence may be able to succeed without assuming (a), in a way that is consistent with compatibilism. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Free Will | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Free Will Defence | |
| 650 | 4 | |a FREE will & determinism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a GOOD & evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Libertarianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Necessity (Philosophy) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Plantinga, Alvin | |
| 650 | 4 | |a problem of evil | |
| 700 | 1 | |a Helms, Nathaniel |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 77(2015), 3, Seite 197-203 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:77 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:197-203 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-015-9512-7 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 297052841X | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 155917563X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170531121913 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170531||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||