Molinists (still) cannot endorse the consequence argument
Perszyk (Faith Philos 20:131-151, ) has argued that Molinists cannot consistently endorse the consequence argument because of a structurally similar argument for the incompatibility of true Molinist counterfactuals of freedom ( CCFs) and the ability to do otherwise. Wierenga (in: Molinism: the conte...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2015
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 77, Issue: 3, Pages: 231-246 |
| Further subjects: | B
Molinism
B Consequence argument B FREE will & determinism B Accidental necessity B Argument B Libertarianism B Compatibilism B Grace (Theology) B Middle Knowledge |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1559176180 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230125165935.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170531s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9473-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1559176180 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)489176186 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ489176186 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Cohen, Yishai |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Molinists (still) cannot endorse the consequence argument |c Yishai Cohen |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Perszyk (Faith Philos 20:131-151, ) has argued that Molinists cannot consistently endorse the consequence argument because of a structurally similar argument for the incompatibility of true Molinist counterfactuals of freedom ( CCFs) and the ability to do otherwise. Wierenga (in: Molinism: the contemporary debate, ) has argued that on the proper understanding of CCFs, there is a relevant difference between the consequence argument and the anti-Molinist argument. I argue that, even on Wierenga's understanding of CCFs, there is in fact no relevant difference between the two arguments. Moreover, I strengthen Perszyk's challenge by highlighting further relevant similarities between CCFs and facts about the laws. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Accidental necessity | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Compatibilism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consequence argument | |
| 650 | 4 | |a FREE will & determinism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Grace (Theology) | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Libertarianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Middle Knowledge | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Molinism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 77(2015), 3, Seite 231-246 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:77 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:231-246 |
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/COHMSC.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9473-2 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2970529122 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1559176180 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170531122617 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170531||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Argument |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Argument |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Argomento |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 逻辑论证 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Argumento |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Аргумент |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Επιχείρημα |
| SUB | |a REL | ||