Molinists (still) cannot endorse the consequence argument
Perszyk (Faith Philos 20:131-151, ) has argued that Molinists cannot consistently endorse the consequence argument because of a structurally similar argument for the incompatibility of true Molinist counterfactuals of freedom ( CCFs) and the ability to do otherwise. Wierenga (in: Molinism: the conte...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
2015
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 77, Issue: 3, Pages: 231-246 |
| Further subjects: | B
Molinism
B Consequence argument B FREE will & determinism B Accidental necessity B Argument B Libertarianism B Compatibilism B Grace (Theology) B Middle Knowledge |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |