Rethinking the Enlightenment, or thinking the Enlightenment for the first time

In his famous comment on Kant’s Was ist Aufklärung?, Foucault considers that the debate ‘for’ or ‘against’ the Enlightenment has no meaning as such, and calls for a new space of inquiry that would take into account our own determination, as subjects, by the Enlightenment, making it the object ofa ne...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Approaching religion
Main Author: Fabiani, Jean-Louis 1951- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: [publisher not identified] [2011]
In: Approaching religion
Further subjects:B Enlightenment
B Michel Foucault, 1926-1984
B Science
B Philosophy
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1559183306
003 DE-627
005 20220627092830.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170531s2011 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
035 |a (DE-627)1559183306 
035 |a (DE-576)489183301 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ489183301 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)142960101  |0 (DE-627)641408994  |0 (DE-576)334323193  |4 aut  |a Fabiani, Jean-Louis  |d 1951- 
109 |a Fabiani, Jean-Louis 1951- 
245 1 0 |a Rethinking the Enlightenment, or thinking the Enlightenment for the first time  |c Jean-Louis Fabiani 
264 1 |c [2011] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In his famous comment on Kant’s Was ist Aufklärung?, Foucault considers that the debate ‘for’ or ‘against’ the Enlightenment has no meaning as such, and calls for a new space of inquiry that would take into account our own determination, as subjects, by the Enlightenment, making it the object ofa new history, still to be written. Although this short text has been quoted over and over, it is still a sort of empty programme that does not overcome the antinomies of modern rationality. I would like to draw on one of Foucault’s most suggestive remarks, albeit in some ways enigmatic: ‘[m]any things in our experience convince us that the historical event of the Enlightenment did not make us mature adults, and we have not reached that stage yet.’ Starting from this statement, I would like to delineate the possibilities of a New Enlightenment, that would not be the first one made better, or rendered adequate to its original project (as an extended rationality or as a reflexive normativity, for instance), but that would take really seriously the potential reflexivity encrypted in the Aufklärung, redefining the legitimate use of reason and the fair distribution of knowledge in a ‘post-rationalist’ age. In order to contribute to the collective reflection, I will use my own ongoing research on two different, but not unrelated topics: the question of the public as it appears in the new ‘cultural public sphere’ and the sociological analysis of the rationalisation process. 
650 4 |a Enlightenment 
650 4 |a Michel Foucault, 1926-1984 
650 4 |a Philosophy 
650 4 |a Science 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Approaching religion  |d Åbo : [Verlag nicht ermittelbar], 2011  |g 1(2011), 2, Seite 7-11  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)718726731  |w (DE-600)2667782-9  |w (DE-576)367402394  |x 1799-3121  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2011  |g number:2  |g pages:7-11 
856 4 0 |u https://journal.fi/ar/article/view/67475  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
936 u w |d 1  |j 2011  |e 2  |h 7-11 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2970539616 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1559183306 
LOK |0 005 20170531141130 
LOK |0 008 170531||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL