How not to render an explanatory version of the evidential argument from evil immune to skeptical theism
Among the things that students of the problem of evil think about is whether explanatory versions of the evidential argument from evil are better than others, better than William Rowe's famous versions of the evidential argument, for example. Some of these students claim that the former are bet...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2015
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 78, Issue: 3, Pages: 277-284 |
| Further subjects: | B
Theism
B Atheism B ROWE, William L., 1931-2015 B GOOD & evil B Theodicy B Trent Dougherty B problem of evil B Skeptical theism B God B Dougherty, Trent |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002c 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1559345314 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20230125165634.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170601s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9501-2 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1559345314 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)48934531X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ48934531X | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1048594203 |0 (DE-627)78068852X |0 (DE-576)176049509 |4 aut |a Howard-Snyder, Daniel | |
| 109 | |a Howard-Snyder, Daniel |a Snyder, Daniel Howard- |a Snyder, Daniel H.- | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a How not to render an explanatory version of the evidential argument from evil immune to skeptical theism |c Daniel Howard-Snyder |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Among the things that students of the problem of evil think about is whether explanatory versions of the evidential argument from evil are better than others, better than William Rowe's famous versions of the evidential argument, for example. Some of these students claim that the former are better than the latter in no small part because the former, unlike the latter, avoid the sorts of worries raised by so-called 'skeptical theists'. Indeed, Trent Dougherty claims to have constructed an explanatory version that is 'fundamentally immune to considerations pertaining to skeptical theism'. I argue that he has done no such thing. | ||
| 601 | |a Argumentation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Atheism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Dougherty, Trent | |
| 650 | 4 | |a God | |
| 650 | 4 | |a GOOD & evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a problem of evil | |
| 650 | 4 | |a ROWE, William L., 1931-2015 | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Skeptical theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Theodicy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Trent Dougherty | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal for philosophy of religion |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970 |g 78(2015), 3, Seite 277-284 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)320442098 |w (DE-600)2005049-5 |w (DE-576)103746927 |x 1572-8684 |7 nnas |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:78 |g year:2015 |g number:3 |g pages:277-284 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9501-2 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |7 1 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2970839733 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1559345314 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170601142916 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170601||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| LOK | |0 939 |a 01-06-17 |b l01 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||
