Rationalist atheology

Atheology, accurately defined by Alvin Plantinga, offers reasons why god's existence is implausible. Skeptically reasoning that theological arguments for god fail to make their case is one way of leaving supernaturalism in an implausible condition. This 'rationalist' atheology appeals...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shook, John R. 1966- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Nature B. V 2015
In: International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 78, Issue: 3, Pages: 329-348
Further subjects:B Rationalism
B Theology
B Atheism
B Theodicy
B Plantinga, Alvin
B Sufficient Reason
B Logic
B Atheology
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 155934590X
003 DE-627
005 20230125165553.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170601s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s11153-014-9498-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)155934590X 
035 |a (DE-576)489345905 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ489345905 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1082508411  |0 (DE-627)84753569X  |0 (DE-576)178755001  |4 aut  |a Shook, John R.  |d 1966- 
109 |a Shook, John R. 1966-  |a Shook, John Robert 1966- 
245 1 0 |a Rationalist atheology  |c John Shook 
264 1 |c 2015 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Atheology, accurately defined by Alvin Plantinga, offers reasons why god's existence is implausible. Skeptically reasoning that theological arguments for god fail to make their case is one way of leaving supernaturalism in an implausible condition. This 'rationalist' atheology appeals to logical standards to point out fallacies and other sorts of inferential gaps. Beyond that methodological marker, few shared tactics characterize atheists and agnostics stalking theological targets. If unbelief be grounded on reason, let atheology start from a theological stronghold: the principle of sufficient reason, a cornerstone of rationality. Seven rules, corollaries to that principle, are enough to show how theological arguments for god repeatedly contravene rationality by perpetuating mysteries, contradictions, begging of questions, pseudo-explanations, and the like. None of these complaints are new, nor has theology been unaware of them. Disorganized atheology has, so far, allowed theology to appear to answer them. Five major arguments for god are systematically analyzed and refuted using these seven rules of rationality, as a preliminary exercise illustrating this re-organized and re-focused rationalist atheology. 
601 |a Atheologie 
650 4 |a Atheism 
650 4 |a Atheology 
650 4 |a Logic 
650 4 |a Plantinga, Alvin 
650 4 |a Rationalism 
650 4 |a Sufficient Reason 
650 4 |a Theodicy 
650 4 |a Theology 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t International journal for philosophy of religion  |d Dordrecht : Springer Nature B.V, 1970  |g 78(2015), 3, Seite 329-348  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320442098  |w (DE-600)2005049-5  |w (DE-576)103746927  |x 1572-8684  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:78  |g year:2015  |g number:3  |g pages:329-348 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s11153-014-9498-6  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2970840898 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 155934590X 
LOK |0 005 20170601143736 
LOK |0 008 170601||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL