Stephen Davis's objection to the second ontological argument
Stephen Davis has argued that the second ontological argument (OA) fails as a theistic proof because it ignores the logical possibility of what he calls an ontologically impossible being. By an 'ontologically impossible being' (OIB) he means a being that (a) does not exist, (b) logically-p...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Springer Nature B. V
[2016]
|
| In: |
International journal for philosophy of religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 80, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-9 |
| Further subjects: | B
Second ontological argument
B Ontologically impossible being (OIB) B Necessary being B Predicate (Logic) B Religion Philosophy B Stephen Davis B God Proof, Ontological B Possibility B Logic |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |