An Inevitable “Marriage March”? A Survey of the “Arbiter of Religious Dogma” in Canadian Case Law
“Arbiter of religious dogma,” first expressed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem ([2004] 2 SCR 551), has had a lasting and pervasive effect on the Canadian lawscape. Developed in an effort to remove the State (and therefore Court apparatus) from a decision-making capaci...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage
[2016]
|
| In: |
Studies in religion
Year: 2016, Volume: 45, Issue: 2, Pages: 127-145 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 156093199X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20180731103504.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170718s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1177/0008429816636089 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)156093199X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)490931995 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ490931995 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Dabby, Dia |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 3 | |a An Inevitable “Marriage March”? A Survey of the “Arbiter of Religious Dogma” in Canadian Case Law |c Dia Dabby |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2016] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a “Arbiter of religious dogma,” first expressed by the Supreme Court of Canada in Syndicat Northcrest v. Amselem ([2004] 2 SCR 551), has had a lasting and pervasive effect on the Canadian lawscape. Developed in an effort to remove the State (and therefore Court apparatus) from a decision-making capacity in questions related to religious doctrine, this expression has become an inevitable mantra when discussing issues related to religion in Canada. This article argues, however, that the presence of this expression should not be understood as the end of a conversation, but rather, the beginning of a novel one on the legitimacy of religion in law. Through discourse analysis, this article will endeavor to suggest that this “marriage march” between law and religion is inevitable in the Canadian context. | ||
| 601 | |a Case law | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Studies in religion |d London : Sage, 1971 |g 45(2016), 2, Seite 127-145 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)617810826 |w (DE-600)2535808-X |w (DE-576)318518368 |x 2042-0587 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:45 |g year:2016 |g number:2 |g pages:127-145 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0008429816636089 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2974378803 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 156093199X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170718081414 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170718||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||