Mindsets and Commentarial Conventions among Indian Buddhists
This article is in five sections. After a brief introduction, I examine Johannes Bronkhorst's hypothesis that postulation of a commentarial “mindset” may help to account for the persistence of errors that occur in medieval Indian root texts and in commentaries on those texts. Although aspects o...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
[2015]
|
| In: |
Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Year: 2015, Volume: 83, Issue: 1, Pages: 210-235 |
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) Volltext (doi) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 156095969X | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20170718122520.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170718s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1093/jaarel/lfu109 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)156095969X | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)490959695 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ490959695 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)1020491647 |0 (DE-627)691235120 |0 (DE-576)360563449 |4 aut |a Nance, Richard F. | |
| 109 | |a Nance, Richard F. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Mindsets and Commentarial Conventions among Indian Buddhists |c Richard F. Nance |
| 264 | 1 | |c [2015] | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article is in five sections. After a brief introduction, I examine Johannes Bronkhorst's hypothesis that postulation of a commentarial “mindset” may help to account for the persistence of errors that occur in medieval Indian root texts and in commentaries on those texts. Although aspects of Bronkhorst's account are tenable, I argue that its overall conclusion is unhelpful and should be reassessed in light of the data provided in Buddhist commentaries and commentarial guides. In the article's third and fourth sections, I explore two instances of commentary that call into question the explanatory power of the commentarial mindset as sketched by Bronkhorst. The fifth section of the article suggests some previously overlooked resources for recovery of the conventions that governed the composition of commentaries among Indian Buddhists. | ||
| 601 | |a Buddhist | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |a American Academy of Religion |t Journal of the American Academy of Religion |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1967 |g 83(2015), 1, Seite 210-235 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)338767819 |w (DE-600)2064642-2 |w (DE-576)10686971X |x 1477-4585 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:83 |g year:2015 |g number:1 |g pages:210-235 |
| 856 | |u http://jaar.oxfordjournals.org/content/early/2015/01/12/jaarel.lfu109.full.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH doi match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://academic.oup.com/jaar/article/83/1/210/693564/Mindsets-and-Commentarial-Conventions-among-Indian |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfu109 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2974427529 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 156095969X | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170718122520 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170718||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||