The Beginning, Not the End: On Continental Philosophy of Religion and Religious Studies

Recently, scholars have reflected critically on the role of philosophy in the field of religious studies and the future of the subfield within the academic study of religion (see Crocket et al. 2014; Smith and Whistler 2010; Schilbrack 2014). One of the common elements of these reflections has been...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Onishi, Bradley B. ca. 20./21. Jh. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press [2017]
In: Journal of the American Academy of Religion
Year: 2017, Volume: 85, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-30
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Religious philosophy / Theological cognition theory / Science of Religion
RelBib Classification:AA Study of religion
AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (doi)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1561036498
003 DE-627
005 20200309145121.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170720s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1093/jaarel/lfw032  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1561036498 
035 |a (DE-576)491036493 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ491036493 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1128162768  |0 (DE-627)882517856  |0 (DE-576)485711990  |4 aut  |a Onishi, Bradley B.  |d ca. 20./21. Jh. 
109 |a Onishi, Bradley B. ca. 20./21. Jh.  |a Onishi, Bradley ca. 20./21. Jh. 
245 1 4 |a The Beginning, Not the End  |b On Continental Philosophy of Religion and Religious Studies  |c Bradley B. Onishi 
264 1 |c [2017] 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recently, scholars have reflected critically on the role of philosophy in the field of religious studies and the future of the subfield within the academic study of religion (see Crocket et al. 2014; Smith and Whistler 2010; Schilbrack 2014). One of the common elements of these reflections has been the concern on the part of philosophers of religion and their colleagues in the academic study of religion that philosophy of religion is in fact a thinly veiled form of theology that has been allowed to exist illegitimately in departments of religious studies. This concern is articulated forcefully in a recent set of publications, ominously titled The Ends of Philosophy of Religion (2013) and “The End of Philosophy of Religion?” (2014), wherein Timothy Knepper argues that philosophy of religion, both in its analytic and continental iterations, “has very little to offer” religious studies for two main reasons. First, “The content of reflection in philosophy of religion is usually either a fictionalized and rarified theism or the latest critical notion of some continental philosopher, not the historical religions of the world in their localized complexity and comparative diversity” (2013, 9). Second, philosophy of religion is either explicitly or implicitly theological: “Philosophy of religion can look more like philosophical theology—not a (relatively) religiously neutral examination of reason-giving in the religions of the world, but an overt apologetic for (or against) the reasonableness or value of some particular kind of religion” (2013, 9).1 In Knepper's view, both analytical and continental philosophy of religion—as they are currently practiced—are abstracted from lived religion and more often than not are forms of theological apologetics rather than a “neutral” evaluation of religious phenomena. 
601 |a Philosophie 
601 |a Religion 
652 |a AA:AB 
689 0 0 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049415-9  |0 (DE-627)104598581  |0 (DE-576)209081953  |2 gnd  |a Religionsphilosophie 
689 0 1 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4185082-8  |0 (DE-627)10466035X  |0 (DE-576)210030011  |2 gnd  |a Theologische Erkenntnistheorie 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4049426-3  |0 (DE-627)106187058  |0 (DE-576)209082003  |2 gnd  |a Religionswissenschaft 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |a American Academy of Religion  |t Journal of the American Academy of Religion  |d Oxford : Oxford University Press, 1967  |g 85(2017), 1, Seite 1-30  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)338767819  |w (DE-600)2064642-2  |w (DE-576)10686971X  |x 1477-4585  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:85  |g year:2017  |g number:1  |g pages:1-30 
856 4 0 |u https://academic.oup.com/jaar/article/85/1/1/3063102/The-Beginning-Not-the-End-On-Continental  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 |u https://doi.org/10.1093/jaarel/lfw032  |x doi  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2974557910 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1561036498 
LOK |0 005 20191126165602 
LOK |0 008 170720||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042966  |a AA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Religious philosophy,Philosophy of religion,Religion,Science of Religion,Religious studies,Religionswissenschaft,Religions,Theological cognition theory,Theory of knowledge,Cognition theory,Theological knowledge,Knowledge 
STB 0 0 |a Philosophie des religions,Science des religions,Théorie théologique de la connaissance 
STC 0 0 |a Ciencias de la religión,Epistemología teológica,Filosofía de religión 
STD 0 0 |a Epistemologia teologica,Filosofia della religione,Scienze religiose 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教哲学,宗教学,神学认识论,神学知识论 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教哲學,宗教學,神學認識論,神學知識論 
STG 0 0 |a Ciências da religião,Epistemologia teológica,Filosofia da religião 
STH 0 0 |a Религиоведение,Теологическая теория познания,Философия религии 
STI 0 0 |a Θεολογική επιστημολογία,Θρησκειολογία,Φιλοσοφία της θρησκείας 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Theologische Erkenntnislehre , Religious studies,Religionsphilosophie,Scholasticism,Scholastik,Theologie,Theology,Religionsforschung 

Similar Items

more