Introduction
Thompson Clarke’s central contention is that the project of traditional epistemology has been deemed invalid for the wrong reasons and its true legacy consequently missed. According to Clarke, the picture of traditional epistemology conveyed by its modern critics gets things about exactly upside dow...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2014
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2014, Volume: 4, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 153-188 |
| Further subjects: | B
Thompson Clarke
traditional epistemology
ordinary language philosophy
contextualism
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1561865850 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141157.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-04031157 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1561865850 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)491865856 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ491865856 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Narboux, Jean-Philippe |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Introduction |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2014 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Thompson Clarke’s central contention is that the project of traditional epistemology has been deemed invalid for the wrong reasons and its true legacy consequently missed. According to Clarke, the picture of traditional epistemology conveyed by its modern critics gets things about exactly upside down. While the sample situations examined by the traditional epistemologist and the standards in the light of which he assesses them, contrary to what his modern critics claim, are not the product of philosophizing, the logical relation that they are supposed to bear to ‘common sense’ and ultimately ‘common sense’ itself are. However, the ‘common sense’ assessed by traditional epistemology, although it is really an artifact of philosophizing, is neither the product of philosophical reflection nor the result of philosophical prejudice. It is not in the least gratuitous. A critique of the traditional philosophical project can only be as compelling as that project itself under the interpretation that it gives of it. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Thompson Clarke |x traditional epistemology |x ordinary language philosophy |x contextualism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 4(2014), 3/4, Seite 153-188 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2014 |g number:3/4 |g pages:153-188 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-04031157 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976721289 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1561865850 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808150411 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||