Religious Rights versus Sexual Orientation Discrimination: A Fair Deal for Everyone
This article examines restrictions on the right to manifest one’s religion which are held to be justified for the protection of the rights of others, in particular, the right not to be discriminated against on the ground of one’s sexual orientation. Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom is scrutin...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2015
|
| In: |
Religion and human rights
Jahr: 2015, Band: 10, Heft: 2, Seiten: 128-159 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Freedom Of Religion
non-discrimination on the ground of sexual orientation
freedom to resign
reasonable accommodation of religion
conscientious objection
Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom
|
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article examines restrictions on the right to manifest one’s religion which are held to be justified for the protection of the rights of others, in particular, the right not to be discriminated against on the ground of one’s sexual orientation. Eweida and Others v. the United Kingdom is scrutinised and it is argued that this suggests three possible ways of dealing with cases where an employee refuses to carry out certain parts of their job because of their religion or belief: using the “free to resign” rule; imposing a duty of reasonable accommodation on employers; and, providing for a conscientious objection exemption. These will be analysed with particular attention for their restrictions and limitations. This should lead to a conclusion as to whether these rights can be reconciled in a way that provides a fair deal for everyone. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-0328 |
| Enthält: | In: Religion and human rights
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12341284 |