The Abbasid Activist Ḥayyān al-ʿAṭṭār as the Father of Jābir b. Ḥayyān: An Influential Hypothesis Revisited
In 1927 Holmyard formulated the hypothesis that the Abbasid activist Ḥayyān al-ʿAṭṭār (“Ḥayyān the Perfumer”, fl. 98/717) was the father of the second/eighth century alchemist Jābir b. Ḥayyān. It will be shown here that this hypothesis is contradicted by two sources that have since been published (t...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2017
|
In: |
Journal of Abbasid Studies
Year: 2017, Volume: 4, Issue: 1, Pages: 35-61 |
Further subjects: | B
Alchemy
Geber
Ḥayyān al-ʿAṭṭār
Jābir b. Ḥayyān
Jābir-problem
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1561899836 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220604141317.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170808s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22142371-12340030 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1561899836 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)491899831 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ491899831 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Delva, Thijs |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Abbasid Activist Ḥayyān al-ʿAṭṭār as the Father of Jābir b. Ḥayyān: An Influential Hypothesis Revisited |
264 | 1 | |c 2017 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a In 1927 Holmyard formulated the hypothesis that the Abbasid activist Ḥayyān al-ʿAṭṭār (“Ḥayyān the Perfumer”, fl. 98/717) was the father of the second/eighth century alchemist Jābir b. Ḥayyān. It will be shown here that this hypothesis is contradicted by two sources that have since been published (the third book of al-Balādhurī’s Ansāb al-ashrāf and the anonymous Akhbār al-ʿAbbās wa-wuldihi). The implications of this finding for the question of Jābir’s historicity will also be explored. Although the references to Jābir in later sources (including a number of new ones that will be listed here) strongly suggest that he is not a historical figure, his historicity is still often accepted, or at least left open as a possibility. It will be argued that Holmyard’s hypothesis has been a crucial factor in this continued acceptance, and that its rejection probably also entails the rejection of a historical Jābir. | ||
601 | |a Abbasiden | ||
650 | 4 | |a Alchemy |x Geber |x Ḥayyān al-ʿAṭṭār |x Jābir b. Ḥayyān |x Jābir-problem | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of Abbasid Studies |d Leiden : Brill, 2014 |g 4(2017), 1, Seite 35-61 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)791558711 |w (DE-600)2779360-6 |w (DE-576)410285269 |x 2214-2371 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:4 |g year:2017 |g number:1 |g pages:35-61 |
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22142371-12340030 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2976755833 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1561899836 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20170808150523 | ||
LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |