Is Justification Dialectical?
Much of present-day epistemology is divided between internalists and externalists. Different as these views are, they have in common that they strip justification from its dialectical component in order to block the skeptic’s argument from disagreement. That is, they allow that one may have justifie...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2013
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2013, Volume: 3, Issue: 3, Pages: 182-201 |
| Further subjects: | B
Justification
dialectic
disagreement
scepticism
internalism
externalism
truth
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1561912891 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141346.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2013 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/221057012X630713 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1561912891 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)491912897 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ491912897 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Willem Wieland, Jan |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Is Justification Dialectical? |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2013 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Much of present-day epistemology is divided between internalists and externalists. Different as these views are, they have in common that they strip justification from its dialectical component in order to block the skeptic’s argument from disagreement. That is, they allow that one may have justified beliefs even if one is not able to defend it against challenges and resolve the disagreements about them. Markus Lammenranta recently argued that neither internalism nor externalism convinces if we consider the argument in its most interesting format. In this paper I zoom in on this debate, and fix further details of Lammenranta’s lead. Specifically, I will side with skepticism that justification is dialectical, yet only if certain conditions are in place. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Justification |x dialectic |x disagreement |x scepticism |x internalism |x externalism |x truth | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 3(2013), 3, Seite 182-201 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:3 |g year:2013 |g number:3 |g pages:182-201 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/221057012X630713 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976769125 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1561912891 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808150549 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||