RATIONAL AUTONOMY AND AUTONOMOUS RATIONALITY: Dooyeweerd, Kant and Fichte on Subjectivity, Objectivity and Normativity
This article is an attempt to discuss Dooyeweerd’s epistemology in the light of German Idealism. First, a characterization of the thought of Kant and Fichte is offered, focusing in particular on three themes: normativity, autonomy and reflexivity. Second, Dooyeweerd’s criticisms of Kant and Fichte a...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2007
|
| In: |
Philosophia reformata
Year: 2007, Volume: 72, Issue: 2, Pages: 105-129 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1561937916 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141457.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2007 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22116117-90000414 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1561937916 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)491937911 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ491937911 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |0 (DE-588)1068727225 |0 (DE-627)820604291 |0 (DE-576)420646663 |4 aut |a DeMoor, Michael J. | |
| 109 | |a DeMoor, Michael J. |a DeMoor, Michael |a Moor, Michael J. de |a De Moor, Michael J. | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a RATIONAL AUTONOMY AND AUTONOMOUS RATIONALITY |b Dooyeweerd, Kant and Fichte on Subjectivity, Objectivity and Normativity |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2007 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a This article is an attempt to discuss Dooyeweerd’s epistemology in the light of German Idealism. First, a characterization of the thought of Kant and Fichte is offered, focusing in particular on three themes: normativity, autonomy and reflexivity. Second, Dooyeweerd’s criticisms of Kant and Fichte are reviewed, and it is argued that, in both cases, Dooyeweerd focuses in on a central paradox that he seeks in his own thought to avoid. Third, Dooyeweerd’s epistemology is examined and it is argued that, not only does his thought exhibit the primary themes of Idealist thought discussed previously, but that it falls into the same apparent paradox as do Kant and Fichte. Finally, the paradox itself is examined and a way forward for Reformational thought is suggested, by analogy with Fichte’s inter-subjective turn. | ||
| 601 | |a Autonomie | ||
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Philosophia reformata |d Leiden : Brill, 1936 |g 72(2007), 2, Seite 105-129 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)618327223 |w (DE-600)2537669-X |w (DE-576)354444204 |x 2352-8230 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:72 |g year:2007 |g number:2 |g pages:105-129 |
| 776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1646525280 |k Non-Electronic | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000414 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 72 |j 2007 |e 2 |h 105-129 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976794251 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1561937916 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808150641 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| OAS | |a 1 |b inherited from superior work | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||