The implications of, and opposition to, the methods and theories of John Wansbrough1

This article serves as an introduction to Wansbrough's methods and theories for the study of the Qur¸dn, its Tafsīr, the Sīra, and other early Islamic texts. Muslim and most non-Muslim scholars work within essentially the same framework: one which reads the literature of early Islam as history....

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Berg, Herbert (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 1997
In: Method & theory in the study of religion
Year: 1997, Volume: 9, Issue: 1, Pages: 3-22
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1561946869
003 DE-627
005 20220604141521.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s1997 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/157006897X00025  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1561946869 
035 |a (DE-576)491946864 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ491946864 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Berg, Herbert  |4 aut 
109 |a Berg, Herbert 
245 1 0 |a The implications of, and opposition to, the methods and theories of John Wansbrough1 
264 1 |c 1997 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article serves as an introduction to Wansbrough's methods and theories for the study of the Qur¸dn, its Tafsīr, the Sīra, and other early Islamic texts. Muslim and most non-Muslim scholars work within essentially the same framework: one which reads the literature of early Islam as history. Wansbrough has demonstrated that what these sources provide is not history per se, but salvation history, and that methods appropriate for the study of this genre are not source critical but literary critical. Through the application of these methods Wansbrough has postulated theories, which, if correct, radically alter our understanding of Islamic origins. Islamicists have tended to fixate on these theories at the expense of the methodological approach from which they are derived. Judging by the arguments raised thus far by these opponents of Wansbrough, I suggest that their aversion to his work stems as much from the unwillingness of Islamicists to accept the uncertainty inherent in his methods and the political incorrectness associated with his theories as from their theoretical conservatism and methodological naivete. 
601 |a Opposition 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Method & theory in the study of religion  |d Leiden : Brill, 1989  |g 9(1997), 1, Seite 3-22  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)34189656X  |w (DE-600)2069397-7  |w (DE-576)100668399  |x 1570-0682  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:9  |g year:1997  |g number:1  |g pages:3-22 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157006897X00025  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976803218 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1561946869 
LOK |0 005 20170808150659 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL