Discrimination within Religious Schools

Places of contact between religion and the state has increased considerably over time; as this overlap has increased, liberals have increasingly seen fit to call for state intervention in religions that are internally discriminatory in the name of equal citizenship. By looking at the issue of direct...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Spinner-Halev, Jeff (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2012
In: Journal of law, religion and state
Year: 2012, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-59
Further subjects:B Liberalism discrimination religion pluralism
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1561985457
003 DE-627
005 20220604141646.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/221248112X638163  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1561985457 
035 |a (DE-576)491985452 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ491985452 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)139641211  |0 (DE-627)703410717  |0 (DE-576)312566190  |4 aut  |a Spinner-Halev, Jeff 
109 |a Spinner-Halev, Jeff  |a Halev, Jeff Spinner- 
245 1 0 |a Discrimination within Religious Schools 
264 1 |c 2012 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Places of contact between religion and the state has increased considerably over time; as this overlap has increased, liberals have increasingly seen fit to call for state intervention in religions that are internally discriminatory in the name of equal citizenship. By looking at the issue of direct and indirect state support for discriminatory schools, I argue for a more pluralistic and tolerant view of religion than that of many liberals. Preserving diversity is an important liberal good that should not lost sight of, though there are limits to the kinds of discrimination the liberal state should support. Much of my argument rests on the distinction between direct and indirect support. The liberal state should impose strict standards on funds it grants directly to organizations, but it should be more relaxed for indirect support it gives, except in exceptional circumstances. 
650 4 |a Liberalism  |x discrimination  |x religion  |x pluralism 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Journal of law, religion and state  |d Leiden : Brill, 2012  |g 1(2012), 1, Seite 45-59  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)796586713  |w (DE-600)2783973-4  |w (DE-576)414227638  |x 2212-4810  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:1  |g year:2012  |g number:1  |g pages:45-59 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1631712861  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/221248112X638163  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 1  |j 2012  |e 1  |h 45-59 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976841985 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1561985457 
LOK |0 005 20170808150820 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL