Conforming Haji Bektash: A Saint and His Followers between Orthopraxy and Heteropraxy


Since his death in the 13th century, the Anatolian Sufi saint Haji Bektash Veli has been the subject of a debate as to whether he conformed to the sharīʿa, different parties having at different times portrayed him as either an antinomian charismatic mystic or a sharīʿa-abiding Sufi scholar. This pap...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Die Welt des Islams
Auteur principal: Soileau, Mark (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2014
Dans: Die Welt des Islams
Sujets non-standardisés:B Haji Bektash Bektashi Sufism heteropraxy
Accès en ligne: Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:Since his death in the 13th century, the Anatolian Sufi saint Haji Bektash Veli has been the subject of a debate as to whether he conformed to the sharīʿa, different parties having at different times portrayed him as either an antinomian charismatic mystic or a sharīʿa-abiding Sufi scholar. This paper traces the course of the debate from the 14th century until today, situating the various interpretations in their historical contexts. As will be seen, interpretations of Haji Bektash’s character are often influenced by that of his followers, the Bektashis, who have come to be known as antinomian. Because this non-conformity poses a problem for sharīʿa-minded commentators, the debate is usually framed in terms that can be summarized as a dichotomy between orthopraxy and heteropraxy. Responding to this, Bektashis have instead reframed the dichotomy as one between what we can call esopraxy and exopraxy. The debate is still active today, showing that the concern for this 13th-century saint’s praxis is still relevant in modern Turkey.

ISSN:1570-0607
Contient:In: Die Welt des Islams
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700607-05434P06