The Kant-Maimonides Constellation
Responding to Zachary Braiterman’s and Daniel Garner’s ideas on post-Holocaust religious thought, the author proposes a new model of relationships between theodicy and antitheodicy in which divine perfection is no longer privileged as the single key factor. Building on Peter Berger’s and Clifford Ge...
| Publié dans: | The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy |
|---|---|
| Auteurs: | ; |
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2012
|
| Dans: |
The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
|
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Antitheodicy
Holocaust
theodicy
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Résumé: | Responding to Zachary Braiterman’s and Daniel Garner’s ideas on post-Holocaust religious thought, the author proposes a new model of relationships between theodicy and antitheodicy in which divine perfection is no longer privileged as the single key factor. Building on Peter Berger’s and Clifford Geertz’s treatments of the problem of evil, it is suggested that focusing on meaning-making and tradition can result in a stratified view of theodicy–antitheodicy more able to engage with the dynamics of several well-known thinkers associated with religious responses to the Holocaust. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-285X |
| Contient: | In: The journal of Jewish thought & philosophy
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/1477285X-12341235 |