Valuing Care Protects Religiosity from the Antisocial Consequences of Impersonal Deontology
Morality typically includes prosociality but often also extends to impersonal deontology. Religion, theoretically and empirically, is concerned with both moral domains. What happens when the two domains are in conflict? Do religious people prefer impersonal deontology at the detriment of prosocialit...
Authors: | ; |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2016
|
In: |
Journal of empirical theology
Year: 2016, Volume: 29, Issue: 2, Pages: 171-189 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Religiosity
/ Morals
/ Deontology
/ Altruism
/ Conflict
|
RelBib Classification: | AE Psychology of religion NCA Ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Care
purity
deontology
consequentialism
morality
religiosity
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |