Skepticism, Suspension of Judgment, and Norms for Belief
According to Sextus Empiricus, the Skeptic suspends judgment in response to equipollence. This fact has two significant implications. First, the Skeptic has at most indirect control over his suspension of judgment and so does not suspend judgment at will. Second, the skeptic accepts the norm of trut...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2015
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2015, Volume: 5, Issue: 2, Pages: 107-125 |
| Further subjects: | B
Pyrrhonian skepticism
suspension of judgment
norms for belief
equipollence
reasons for belief
doxastic voluntarism
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1562024086 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141829.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-04010007 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1562024086 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)492024081 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492024081 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Perin, Casey |4 aut | |
| 109 | |a Perin, Casey | ||
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Skepticism, Suspension of Judgment, and Norms for Belief |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2015 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a According to Sextus Empiricus, the Skeptic suspends judgment in response to equipollence. This fact has two significant implications. First, the Skeptic has at most indirect control over his suspension of judgment and so does not suspend judgment at will. Second, the skeptic accepts the norm of truth for belief. This is a norm according to which one ought to believe that p only if p is true. However, there are passages in the Outlines of Pyrrhonism that imply the Skeptic accepts the norm of utility for belief. This is a norm according to which one ought to believe that p only if the belief that p promotes one’s tranquility. I first argue that if the Skeptic suspends judgment in response to equipollence, then a pragmatic reason can’t be the reason for which the Skeptic suspends judgment. I then argue that the norms of truth and utility for belief are incompatible just in the sense that the acceptance of the one precludes the acceptance of the other. If Sextus describes the Skeptic as accepting both of these norms for belief, as I argue he does, his conception of Skepticism in the Outlines is not coherent. | ||
| 601 | |a Suspension | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Pyrrhonian skepticism |x suspension of judgment |x norms for belief |x equipollence |x reasons for belief |x doxastic voluntarism | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 5(2015), 2, Seite 107-125 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:5 |g year:2015 |g number:2 |g pages:107-125 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-04010007 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976880808 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1562024086 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808150945 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| SUB | |a REL | ||