"ASPECTS" AND "FUNCTIONS" OF INDIVIDUAL THINGS

'Modal aspect’ is a central notion in so-called ‘Calvinistic Philosophy’ (henceforth referred to as CP1). To be sure, this is true of only one of its versions, namely Dooyeweerd’s. For Vollenhoven’s systematic philosophy, which of course may also lay claim on the title CP, has no use for it. In...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Woudenberg, René van 1957- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2003
In: Philosophia reformata
Year: 2003, Volume: 68, Issue: 1, Pages: 1-13
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562027662
003 DE-627
005 20220604141848.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2003 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22116117-90000272  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562027662 
035 |a (DE-576)492027668 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492027668 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)173741355  |0 (DE-627)698646932  |0 (DE-576)134582233  |4 aut  |a Woudenberg, René van  |d 1957- 
109 |a Woudenberg, René van 1957-  |a Van Woudenberg, René 1957- 
245 1 0 |a "ASPECTS" AND "FUNCTIONS" OF INDIVIDUAL THINGS 
264 1 |c 2003 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a 'Modal aspect’ is a central notion in so-called ‘Calvinistic Philosophy’ (henceforth referred to as CP1). To be sure, this is true of only one of its versions, namely Dooyeweerd’s. For Vollenhoven’s systematic philosophy, which of course may also lay claim on the title CP, has no use for it. In his version pride of place is given to the notion of ‘function’. This paper is a meditation on the question what ‘aspects’ and ‘functions’, within the bounds of CP, are supposed to be. Doing so will shed, I hope, at least some light on the question which, if any, of the two is the more intelligible and useful notion. Right at the beginning I should like to make it clear that this paper is narrowly focussed on the indicated questions. My aim is not to discuss any theory about modal aspects, such as Dooyeweerd’s theory that modal aspects are refractions in time of something supra temporal, or his theory that there is an Archimedian Point from which human beings can overlook the various modal aspects. Nor will I discuss any theory about functions. The indicated questions seek to establish what the phenomena are that such theories are about. This paper is also narrowly focussed in that whatever differences may turn out to exist in the course of this meditation between Vollenhoven and Dooyeweerd, it will not discuss them in any depth. A serious discussion of these differences will have to take into account the theories that I propose presently not to deal with. Let me now turn to the first question. 
601 |a Individuation 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Philosophia reformata  |d Leiden : Brill, 1936  |g 68(2003), 1, Seite 1-13  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618327223  |w (DE-600)2537669-X  |w (DE-576)354444204  |x 2352-8230  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:68  |g year:2003  |g number:1  |g pages:1-13 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1645270114  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000272  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976884382 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562027662 
LOK |0 005 20170808150954 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL