The Distinct Nature of the European Union

This article aims to examine the distinct nature of the European Union (eu), specifically from a neo-Calvinist perspective. While Herman Dooyeweerd makes a distinction between a state and an international organisation, namely the United Nations (un), within his radical type of juridically qualified...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Philosophia reformata
Main Author: Luitwieler, Sander 1978- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2015
In: Philosophia reformata
RelBib Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KBA Western Europe
KDD Protestant Church
VA Philosophy
ZC Politics in general
Further subjects:B EU European integration coercion legitimacy state, nation neo-Calvinism Dooyeweerd Chaplin
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562029568
003 DE-627
005 20220604141850.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2015 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/23528230-08001006  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562029568 
035 |a (DE-576)492029563 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492029563 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)13659977X  |0 (DE-627)694503487  |0 (DE-576)301102163  |4 aut  |a Luitwieler, Sander  |d 1978- 
109 |a Luitwieler, Sander 1978- 
245 1 4 |a The Distinct Nature of the European Union 
264 1 |c 2015 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This article aims to examine the distinct nature of the European Union (eu), specifically from a neo-Calvinist perspective. While Herman Dooyeweerd makes a distinction between a state and an international organisation, namely the United Nations (un), within his radical type of juridically qualified societal structures, he mainly deals with the state in his work. This article considers whether Jonathan Chaplin’s critique of Dooyeweerd’s distinction, focusing on coercion and legitimacy in the context of the un, may be helpful to establish the nature of the eu. In addition, it introduces another distinction to this end, namely between the state as a political community and the nation as a cultural community. This distinction suggests the need to think about an additional category in between an inter-communal relationship and a community: the eu as a “community of peoples”. 
650 4 |a EU  |x European integration  |x coercion  |x legitimacy  |x state, nation  |x neo-Calvinism  |x Dooyeweerd  |x Chaplin 
652 |a KAJ:KBA:KDD:VA:ZC 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Philosophia reformata  |d Leiden : Brill, 1936  |g 80(2015), 1, Seite 123-139  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618327223  |w (DE-600)2537669-X  |w (DE-576)354444204  |x 2352-8230  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:80  |g year:2015  |g number:1  |g pages:123-139 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/23528230-08001006  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 80  |j 2015  |e 1  |h 123-139 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976886296 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562029568 
LOK |0 005 20200905115018 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442050047  |a KDD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053844  |a VA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736965  |a ZC 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044691  |a KBA 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044640  |a KAJ 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Europäische Union