Skeptical Effectiveness: A Reply to Buford and Brueckner
In an earlier paper, I presented a novel objection to closure-based skeptical arguments. There I argued that the best account of what makes skeptical scenarios effective cripples the closure-based skeptical arguments that use those scenarios. On behalf of the skeptic, Christopher Buford and Anthony...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2016
|
| In: |
International journal for the study of skepticism
Year: 2016, Volume: 6, Issue: 4, Pages: 397-403 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Scepticism
|
| Further subjects: | B
skeptical scenarios
closure principle
kk principle
false belief account
ignorance account
|
| Online Access: |
Presumably Free Access Volltext (Verlag) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1562030922 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220604141851.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 170808s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/22105700-05041194 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1562030922 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-576)492030928 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492030928 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Murphy, Peter |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Skeptical Effectiveness: A Reply to Buford and Brueckner |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2016 | |
| 300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a In an earlier paper, I presented a novel objection to closure-based skeptical arguments. There I argued that the best account of what makes skeptical scenarios effective cripples the closure-based skeptical arguments that use those scenarios. On behalf of the skeptic, Christopher Buford and Anthony Brueckner have replied to my objection. Here I review my original argument, criticize their replies, and highlight two important issues for further investigation. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a skeptical scenarios |x closure principle |x kk principle |x false belief account |x ignorance account | |
| 689 | 0 | 0 | |d s |0 (DE-588)4055225-1 |0 (DE-627)104213140 |0 (DE-576)209112794 |2 gnd |a Skeptizismus |
| 689 | 0 | |5 (DE-627) | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t International journal for the study of skepticism |d Leiden : Brill, 2011 |g 6(2016), 4, Seite 397-403 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)660812843 |w (DE-600)2610085-X |w (DE-576)345005341 |x 2210-5700 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:6 |g year:2016 |g number:4 |g pages:397-403 |
| 856 | |u https://philpapers.org/archive/MURSEA-5.pdf |x unpaywall |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] | ||
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-05041194 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 2976887667 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1562030922 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20170808151001 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
| OAS | |a 1 | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
| REL | |a 1 | ||
| STA | 0 | 0 | |a Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism |
| STB | 0 | 0 | |a Scepticisme |
| STC | 0 | 0 | |a Escepticismo |
| STD | 0 | 0 | |a Scetticismo |
| STE | 0 | 0 | |a 怀疑主义,怀疑论 |
| STF | 0 | 0 | |a 懷疑主義,懷疑論 |
| STG | 0 | 0 | |a Ceticismo |
| STH | 0 | 0 | |a Скептицизм |
| STI | 0 | 0 | |a Σκεπτικισμός |
| SUB | |a REL | ||
| SYG | 0 | 0 | |a Skepsis,Skeptik |