DUALITY OR DUALISM: A REPLY TO JOHAN STELLINGWERFF

In Philosophia Reformata, Vol. 69, No. 1, Johan Stellingwerff published a challenging article1 on the need to rethink the philosophy of technology in reformational philosophy. Stellingwerff is not only critical about the work done by Van Riessen and Schuurman, but he also criticizes the Dual Nature...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: de Vries, Marc J. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2005
In: Philosophia reformata
Year: 2005, Volume: 70, Issue: 1, Pages: 64-69
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562054066
003 DE-627
005 20220604141946.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2005 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22116117-90000342  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562054066 
035 |a (DE-576)492054061 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492054061 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a de Vries, Marc J.  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a DUALITY OR DUALISM  |b A REPLY TO JOHAN STELLINGWERFF 
264 1 |c 2005 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In Philosophia Reformata, Vol. 69, No. 1, Johan Stellingwerff published a challenging article1 on the need to rethink the philosophy of technology in reformational philosophy. Stellingwerff is not only critical about the work done by Van Riessen and Schuurman, but he also criticizes the Dual Nature of Technical Artifacts program at the Delft University of Technology.2 In this reply I want to take up particularly some of the points of criticism against the latter and see if they can be upheld when taking a closer look at what has been published in this program so far. Although the article by Stellingwerff is in Dutch, I have decided to write my reply in English to enable a wider audience to take part in the debate. 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Philosophia reformata  |d Leiden : Brill, 1936  |g 70(2005), 1, Seite 64-69  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618327223  |w (DE-600)2537669-X  |w (DE-576)354444204  |x 2352-8230  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:70  |g year:2005  |g number:1  |g pages:64-69 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1645894533  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000342  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976910863 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562054066 
LOK |0 005 20170808151054 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL