The Construction of Historical Memory in the Exegesis of Kor 16, 106
This article analyzes reports about the capture and torture of the companion ʿAmmār b. Yāsir and their later use in the exegesis of Kor 16, 106. It also shows why the reports were generated by different sectarian communities (Imamī Šīʿites, Zaydites, Murǧiʾites) in the different parts of the early I...
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill
2015
|
| In: |
Arabica
Jahr: 2015, Band: 62, Heft: 5/6, Seiten: 607-651 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
histoire islamique
théologie
ḥadīṯ
exégèse coranique
ʿAmmār b. Yāsir
loi islamique
mémoire historique
B Islamic history theology ḥadīṯ Qurʾānic exegesis ʿAmmār b. Yāsir Islamic law historical memory |
| Online Zugang: |
Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang Volltext (Verlag) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article analyzes reports about the capture and torture of the companion ʿAmmār b. Yāsir and their later use in the exegesis of Kor 16, 106. It also shows why the reports were generated by different sectarian communities (Imamī Šīʿites, Zaydites, Murǧiʾites) in the different parts of the early Islamic empire (Kufa, Mecca, Medina, Basra, and Jazira) in the late first/seventh and early second/eighth centuries. Through a detailed and comprehensive analysis of the isnāds of reports, the article shows that it is possible to correlate information about the sectarian affiliations of reports’ transmitters with the contents of the reports and in the process shows why different communities remembered and transmitted the specific forms of the reports that they did. The article shows how literary Islamic sources are susceptible to a much more granular historical analysis than previously assumed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0585 |
| Enthält: | In: Arabica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700585-12341378 |