The Educational Autonomy of Perfectionist Religious Groups in a Liberal State
This Article draws upon, but reworks, John Rawls’ framework from Political Liberalism to determine the degree of educational autonomy that illiberal perfectionist religious groups ought to enjoy in a liberal state. I start by arguing that Rawls mistakenly concludes that political liberalism flatly c...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Brill
2012
|
In: |
Journal of law, religion and state
Year: 2012, Volume: 1, Issue: 1, Pages: 16-44 |
Further subjects: | B
Rawls
Political Liberalism
political conception of the person
federalism
perfectionism
education
exit
Kymlicka
Sen
Waldron
|
Online Access: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1562106015 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20220604142203.0 | ||
007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
008 | 170808s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/221248112X638154 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1562106015 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)492106010 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ492106010 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rakwb | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |a Rosen, Mark D. |4 aut | |
245 | 1 | 0 | |a The Educational Autonomy of Perfectionist Religious Groups in a Liberal State |
264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
300 | |a Online-Ressource | ||
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a This Article draws upon, but reworks, John Rawls’ framework from Political Liberalism to determine the degree of educational autonomy that illiberal perfectionist religious groups ought to enjoy in a liberal state. I start by arguing that Rawls mistakenly concludes that political liberalism flatly cannot accommodate Perfectionists, and that his misstep is attributable to two errors: (1) Rawls utilizes an overly restrictive “political conception of the person” in determining who participates in the original position, and (2) Rawls overlooks the possibility of a “federalist” basic political structure that can afford significant political autonomy to different groups within a single country. With these insights, I argue that some, though not all, religious Perfectionists are consistent with a stable liberal polity, and explain why foundational Rawlsian premises require that Perfectionists be accommodated to the extent possible. | ||
601 | |a Autonomie | ||
650 | 4 | |a Rawls |x Political Liberalism |x political conception of the person |x federalism |x perfectionism |x education |x exit |x Kymlicka |x Sen |x Waldron | |
773 | 0 | 8 | |i In |t Journal of law, religion and state |d Leiden : Brill, 2012 |g 1(2012), 1, Seite 16-44 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)796586713 |w (DE-600)2783973-4 |w (DE-576)414227638 |x 2212-4810 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:1 |g year:2012 |g number:1 |g pages:16-44 |
776 | |i Erscheint auch als |n Druckausgabe |w (DE-627)1631712802 |k Non-Electronic | ||
856 | 4 | 0 | |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/221248112X638154 |x Verlag |3 Volltext |
935 | |a mteo | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2976963061 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1562106015 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20170808151241 | ||
LOK | |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a bril | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |