Skepticism and Elegance

Jonathan Vogel has argued in support of an explanationist response to skepticism in several works. Central to this explanationist response is the fact that our non-skeptical view of the world (the Real World Hypothesis, rwh) is a better explanation of our experiences than its skeptical rivals. Despi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal for the study of skepticism
Main Author: McCain, Kevin 1980- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2016
In: International journal for the study of skepticism
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Vogel, Jonathan M. / Gifford, Matthew / Everyday knowledge / Scepticism
Further subjects:B Explanationism skepticism Vogel
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 156210974X
003 DE-627
005 20220604142221.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22105700-04031167  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)156210974X 
035 |a (DE-576)492109745 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492109745 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)1077455100  |0 (DE-627)836709055  |0 (DE-576)40912043X  |4 aut  |a McCain, Kevin  |d 1980- 
109 |a McCain, Kevin 1980-  |a MacCain, Kevin 1980- 
245 1 0 |a Skepticism and Elegance 
264 1 |c 2016 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Jonathan Vogel has argued in support of an explanationist response to skepticism in several works. Central to this explanationist response is the fact that our non-skeptical view of the world (the Real World Hypothesis, rwh) is a better explanation of our experiences than its skeptical rivals. Despite the plausibility of this response to skepticism, it is not without its critics. Recently, Matthew Gifford has argued that Vogel’s response has problems on two fronts. First, Gifford argues that Vogel’s strategy for showing that the rwh is a better explanation than its skeptical rivals fails. Second, he argues that if Vogel’s strategy does succeed, then it accomplishes too much—it removes skeptical doubts when it should not. I argue that Gifford is mistaken on both accounts. 
650 4 |a Explanationism  |x skepticism  |x Vogel 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)1197161260  |0 (DE-627)1678963216  |2 gnd  |a Vogel, Jonathan M. 
689 0 1 |d p  |0 (DE-588)1197162127  |0 (DE-627)1678965804  |2 gnd  |a Gifford, Matthew 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4112497-2  |0 (DE-627)10419703X  |0 (DE-576)209468483  |2 gnd  |a Alltagswissen 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4055225-1  |0 (DE-627)104213140  |0 (DE-576)209112794  |2 gnd  |a Skeptizismus 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i In  |t International journal for the study of skepticism  |d Leiden : Brill, 2011  |g 6(2016), 1, Seite 30-43  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)660812843  |w (DE-600)2610085-X  |w (DE-576)345005341  |x 2210-5700  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:6  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:30-43 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-04031167  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 6  |j 2016  |e 1  |h 30-43 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976966796 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 156210974X 
LOK |0 005 20170808151248 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Everyday knowledge,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism 
STB 0 0 |a Savoir quotidien,Scepticisme 
STC 0 0 |a Conocimiento común,Escepticismo 
STD 0 0 |a Sapere quotidiano,Scetticismo 
STE 0 0 |a 怀疑主义,怀疑论 
STF 0 0 |a 懷疑主義,懷疑論 
STG 0 0 |a Ceticismo,Conhecimento comum 
STH 0 0 |a Повседневное знание,Скептицизм 
STI 0 0 |a Καθημερινή γνώση,Σκεπτικισμός 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a Vogel, Jonathan , Handlungswissen,Alltagsrätsel , Skepsis,Skeptik