|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000caa a22000002 4500 |
001 |
156210974X |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20220604142221.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
170808s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1163/22105700-04031167
|2 doi
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)156210974X
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-576)492109745
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)BSZ492109745
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
084 |
|
|
|a 0
|2 ssgn
|
100 |
1 |
|
|0 (DE-588)1077455100
|0 (DE-627)836709055
|0 (DE-576)40912043X
|4 aut
|a McCain, Kevin
|d 1980-
|
109 |
|
|
|a McCain, Kevin 1980-
|a MacCain, Kevin 1980-
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Skepticism and Elegance
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2016
|
300 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a Jonathan Vogel has argued in support of an explanationist response to skepticism in several works. Central to this explanationist response is the fact that our non-skeptical view of the world (the Real World Hypothesis, rwh) is a better explanation of our experiences than its skeptical rivals. Despite the plausibility of this response to skepticism, it is not without its critics. Recently, Matthew Gifford has argued that Vogel’s response has problems on two fronts. First, Gifford argues that Vogel’s strategy for showing that the rwh is a better explanation than its skeptical rivals fails. Second, he argues that if Vogel’s strategy does succeed, then it accomplishes too much—it removes skeptical doubts when it should not. I argue that Gifford is mistaken on both accounts.
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Explanationism
|x skepticism
|x Vogel
|
689 |
0 |
0 |
|d p
|0 (DE-588)1197161260
|0 (DE-627)1678963216
|2 gnd
|a Vogel, Jonathan M.
|
689 |
0 |
1 |
|d p
|0 (DE-588)1197162127
|0 (DE-627)1678965804
|2 gnd
|a Gifford, Matthew
|
689 |
0 |
2 |
|d s
|0 (DE-588)4112497-2
|0 (DE-627)10419703X
|0 (DE-576)209468483
|2 gnd
|a Alltagswissen
|
689 |
0 |
3 |
|d s
|0 (DE-588)4055225-1
|0 (DE-627)104213140
|0 (DE-576)209112794
|2 gnd
|a Skeptizismus
|
689 |
0 |
|
|5 (DE-627)
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i In
|t International journal for the study of skepticism
|d Leiden : Brill, 2011
|g 6(2016), 1, Seite 30-43
|h Online-Ressource
|w (DE-627)660812843
|w (DE-600)2610085-X
|w (DE-576)345005341
|x 2210-5700
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:6
|g year:2016
|g number:1
|g pages:30-43
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-04031167
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
935 |
|
|
|a mteo
|
936 |
u |
w |
|d 6
|j 2016
|e 1
|h 30-43
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
ITA |
|
|
|a 1
|t 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 2976966796
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 156210974X
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20170808151248
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-Tue135
|c DE-627
|d DE-Tue135
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-Tue135
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a bril
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw
|
REL |
|
|
|a 1
|
STA |
0 |
0 |
|a Everyday knowledge,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism
|
STB |
0 |
0 |
|a Savoir quotidien,Scepticisme
|
STC |
0 |
0 |
|a Conocimiento común,Escepticismo
|
STD |
0 |
0 |
|a Sapere quotidiano,Scetticismo
|
STE |
0 |
0 |
|a 怀疑主义,怀疑论
|
STF |
0 |
0 |
|a 懷疑主義,懷疑論
|
STG |
0 |
0 |
|a Ceticismo,Conhecimento comum
|
STH |
0 |
0 |
|a Повседневное знание,Скептицизм
|
STI |
0 |
0 |
|a Καθημερινή γνώση,Σκεπτικισμός
|
SUB |
|
|
|a REL
|
SYG |
0 |
0 |
|a Vogel, Jonathan , Handlungswissen,Alltagsrätsel , Skepsis,Skeptik
|