Co-Creator or Creative Predator?

While the Catholic Church’s official teaching on the environment presents a hopeful and comprehensive ecological ethic rooted in the goodness of creation and humanity’s privileged role as co-creator, it does not sufficiently account for the violence of predation and humanity’s necessary participatio...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Scheid, Daniel P. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2014
In: Worldviews
Year: 2014, Volume: 18, Issue: 2, Pages: 99-121
Further subjects:B environmental / ecological ethics James Nash human ecology religious aspects Christianity Christian ethics
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562136364
003 DE-627
005 20220604142320.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2014 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/15685357-01802001  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562136364 
035 |a (DE-576)49213636X 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ49213636X 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)1084140667  |0 (DE-627)848326369  |0 (DE-576)456201742  |4 aut  |a Scheid, Daniel P. 
109 |a Scheid, Daniel P. 
245 1 0 |a Co-Creator or Creative Predator? 
264 1 |c 2014 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a While the Catholic Church’s official teaching on the environment presents a hopeful and comprehensive ecological ethic rooted in the goodness of creation and humanity’s privileged role as co-creator, it does not sufficiently account for the violence of predation and humanity’s necessary participation in it. James Nash’s understanding of humans as altruistic, creative predators can further Catholic ecological ethics because it strikes a better balance between humanity’s call to love creation and the moral ambiguity of the evolutionary process. Humans as creative predators suggests three new understandings of what ecological sacrifice could entail: 1) to see the death of every creature, even if a morally justifiable death, as a kind of sacrifice; 2) to recognize that ecological sustainability may demand dramatic and subversive shifts in behavior; and 3) to sacrifice our tendency to view nonhumans instrumentally by advocating a Biotic Bill of Rights. 
650 4 |a environmental/ecological ethics  |x James Nash  |x human ecology  |x religious aspects  |x Christianity  |x Christian ethics 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Worldviews  |d Leiden [u.a.] : Brill, 1997  |g 18(2014), 2, Seite 99-121  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)325567123  |w (DE-600)2036957-8  |w (DE-576)098474359  |x 1568-5357  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:18  |g year:2014  |g number:2  |g pages:99-121 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685357-01802001  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2976993564 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562136364 
LOK |0 005 20170808151341 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL