Reforming Philosophy of Religion: Some Methodological Cautions
Kevin Schilbrack’s Philosophy and the Study of Religion: A Manifesto proposes to reform the traditional Philosophy of Religion by reference to three goals that it should have. In pursuit of those goals he argues for a pair of hierarchical two-stage methodologies. I argue that there are tensions betw...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Brill
2016
|
| Dans: |
Method & theory in the study of religion
Année: 2016, Volume: 28, Numéro: 1, Pages: 54-67 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Schilbrack
philosophy of religion
methodology
interpretation
Davidson
|
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Édition parallèle: | Électronique
|
| Résumé: | Kevin Schilbrack’s Philosophy and the Study of Religion: A Manifesto proposes to reform the traditional Philosophy of Religion by reference to three goals that it should have. In pursuit of those goals he argues for a pair of hierarchical two-stage methodologies. I argue that there are tensions between his defence of these methodologies and the philosophical apparatus he brings to bear in explicating the goals themselves. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1570-0682 |
| Contient: | In: Method & theory in the study of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15700682-12341354 |