Fighting Religious Intolerance and Discrimination: The un Account

The main United Nations (un) global policy framework for combating religious intolerance, stigmatisation, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons based on religion or belief is set down in un Human Rights Council resolution 16/18. Adopted in March 2011, this resolution wa...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Limon, Marc (Author) ; Ghanea, Nazila (Author) ; Power, Hilary (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill, Nijhoff 2016
In: Religion and human rights
Year: 2016, Volume: 11, Issue: 1, Pages: 21-65
Further subjects:B Religious Intolerance religious discrimination Resolution 16 / 18
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562183443
003 DE-627
005 20220604142525.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2016 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/18710328-12341295  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562183443 
035 |a (DE-576)492183449 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492183449 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Limon, Marc  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Fighting Religious Intolerance and Discrimination: The un Account 
264 1 |c 2016 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a The main United Nations (un) global policy framework for combating religious intolerance, stigmatisation, discrimination, incitement to violence and violence against persons based on religion or belief is set down in un Human Rights Council resolution 16/18. Adopted in March 2011, this resolution was hailed by stakeholders from all regions as a turning point in international efforts to confront religious intolerance. After more than five decades, un member states had, it was hoped, at last come together to agree a common, consensus-based approach and practical plan of action. Some four years on, and against the backdrop of heightened religious hostility, un consensus around the ‘16/18 framework’ continues to be contested. Rather than working together to implement the 16/18 action plan, states have returned to pre-2011 arguments over the nature of the problem. These divisions have re-emerged in large part because of conceptual confusion among policymakers about what implementation of resolution 16/18 means and what it entails. Linked to (and indeed flowing from) this conceptual opacity, states—especially states from the Western Group (weog) and the Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (oic)—contend over whether resolution 16/18 is being effectively implemented or not and, if not, why this is so. This article offers an assessment of levels of implementation of resolution 16/18 as well as recommendations for strengthened compliance in the future. 
650 4 |a Religious Intolerance  |x religious discrimination  |x Resolution 16/18 
700 1 |0 (DE-588)1057657336  |0 (DE-627)796135088  |0 (DE-576)187259623  |4 aut  |a Ghanea, Nazila 
700 1 |a Power, Hilary  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Religion and human rights  |d Leiden : Brill, Nijhoff, 2006  |g 11(2016), 1, Seite 21-65  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)518818446  |w (DE-600)2254876-2  |w (DE-576)321221702  |x 1871-0328  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:11  |g year:2016  |g number:1  |g pages:21-65 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18710328-12341295  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2977040862 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562183443 
LOK |0 005 20170808151509 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL