Religious Revolutionaries and Spiritualism in Germany around 1848

With a strong focus on Christian Gottfried Daniel Nees von Esenbeck (1776–1858), erstwhile president of the German Academy of the Natural Scientists Leopoldina, as it was then known, this article inquires into the connections between his political involvements in the German revolutionary Vormärz (pr...

Description complète

Enregistré dans:  
Détails bibliographiques
Publié dans:Aries
Auteur principal: Cyranka, Daniel 1969- (Auteur)
Type de support: Électronique Article
Langue:Anglais
Vérifier la disponibilité: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
En cours de chargement...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publié: Brill 2016
Dans: Aries
Sujets / Chaînes de mots-clés standardisés:B Nees von Esenbeck, Christian Gottfried Daniel 1776-1858 / Allemagne / Vormärz / Révolution (1848) / Mouvement des catholiques allemands / Verein der Protestantischen Freunde / Davis, Andrew Jackson 1826-1910 / Spiritualisme / Voyance / Changement socioculturel
RelBib Classification:AA Sciences des religions
AZ Nouveau mouvement religieux
KBB Espace germanophone
ZC Politique en général
Sujets non-standardisés:B Spiritualism spiritism revolution religion Germany Catholicism science
Accès en ligne: Volltext (RS4LF)
Volltext (Verlag)
Description
Résumé:With a strong focus on Christian Gottfried Daniel Nees von Esenbeck (1776–1858), erstwhile president of the German Academy of the Natural Scientists Leopoldina, as it was then known, this article inquires into the connections between his political involvements in the German revolutionary Vormärz (pre-March) era and in the 1848 revolutions, in the movements spearheaded by the German Catholics (Deutschkatholiken) and the Protestant Friends (Lichtfreunde) as well as in the debates carried out during this period on science and scientificity. Beyond a discussion of these associations that scholarship has addressed, the article explores the role of spiritism or spiritualism within these contexts. In light of that, Nees’ reception of the writings of Andrew Jackson Davis (1826–1910) is examined with respect to the prevalence of continuities and discontinuities between Nees’ scientific work, his political and religious activities and his intellectual preoccupation with visions and the notion of divination.
ISSN:1570-0593
Contient:In: Aries
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15700593-01601002