UNDERSTANDING DOOYEWEERD BETTER THAN HE UNDERSTOOD HIMSELF

Ernst Cassirer (1946, 140) once observed: “In the history of ideas it is by no means unusual that a thinker develops a theory, the full purport and significance of which is still hidden to himself.” Cassirer was echoing no less a personage than Kant himself. Kant had written long before: “”¦ it is...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Plantinga, Theodore (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2009
In: Philosophia reformata
Year: 2009, Volume: 74, Issue: 2, Pages: 105-114
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562188968
003 DE-627
005 20220604142545.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2009 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22116117-90000466  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562188968 
035 |a (DE-576)492188963 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492188963 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Plantinga, Theodore  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a UNDERSTANDING DOOYEWEERD BETTER THAN HE UNDERSTOOD HIMSELF 
264 1 |c 2009 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Ernst Cassirer (1946, 140) once observed: “In the history of ideas it is by no means unusual that a thinker develops a theory, the full purport and significance of which is still hidden to himself.” Cassirer was echoing no less a personage than Kant himself. Kant had written long before: “”¦ it is by no means unusual, upon comparing the thoughts which an author has expressed in regard to his subject, whether in ordinary conversation or in writing, to find that we understand him better than he has understood himself. As he has not sufficiently determined his concept, he has sometimes spoken, or even thought, in opposition to his own intention.”2 May we take our lead from Kant here? May we understand Dooyeweerd better than he understood himself, even to the point of attributing to him a view or views that would appear to be “in opposition to his own intention”? It may sound a little strange, but something of this sort seems to have been underway among Dooyeweerd interpreters for quite some time. Many have started from the assumption that Dooyeweerd and Vollenhoven held to essentially the same position. Now, since there were some widely acknowledged differences, something would have to yield, and what often yielded was Dooyeweerd. It was thought that in essence Dooyeweerd was saying what Vollenhoven had also been saying. One could therefore allow for an error in Dooyeweerd here or there — perhaps even a “contradiction” — while continuing to hold him in high esteem. 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Philosophia reformata  |d Leiden : Brill, 1936  |g 74(2009), 2, Seite 105-114  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618327223  |w (DE-600)2537669-X  |w (DE-576)354444204  |x 2352-8230  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:74  |g year:2009  |g number:2  |g pages:105-114 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646752449  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000466  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 74  |j 2009  |e 2  |h 105-114 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2977046410 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562188968 
LOK |0 005 20170808151519 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL