RESPONSE TO CARL MITCHAM

I feel honored to be asked to respond to the text of Carl Mitcham’s Van Riessen lecture. Although philosophy of technology is not my field, there is much to make this task attractive, as Hendrik Van Riessen’s personality and philosophy have been formative influences on my own development, and this L...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Griffioen, Sander 1941- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2010
In: Philosophia reformata
Year: 2010, Volume: 75, Issue: 1, Pages: 36-42
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Parallel Edition:Non-electronic

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1562237357
003 DE-627
005 20220604142735.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 170808s2010 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1163/22116117-90000480  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1562237357 
035 |a (DE-576)492237352 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ492237352 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rakwb 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |0 (DE-588)172105765  |0 (DE-627)697017575  |0 (DE-576)132978776  |4 aut  |a Griffioen, Sander  |d 1941- 
109 |a Griffioen, Sander 1941-  |a Griffioen, S. 1941- 
245 1 0 |a RESPONSE TO CARL MITCHAM 
264 1 |c 2010 
300 |a Online-Ressource 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a I feel honored to be asked to respond to the text of Carl Mitcham’s Van Riessen lecture. Although philosophy of technology is not my field, there is much to make this task attractive, as Hendrik Van Riessen’s personality and philosophy have been formative influences on my own development, and this Lecture contains so much that is stimulating (as well as debatable). The setting in which Mitcham situates Van Riessen’s contribution seems to be the right one. Van Riessen’s seriousness and analytic depth are praised. Mitcham is also very positive about his focus on the internal structure of technology (techniek),1 and is convinced of the fruitfulness of this approach. He not only holds that it deserves greater attention than it has received, but also that it is still relevant today, comparing favourably with the now prevalent ‘social constructionist reflection on science and technology’. 
601 |a Mitcham, Carl 
773 0 8 |i In  |t Philosophia reformata  |d Leiden : Brill, 1936  |g 75(2010), 1, Seite 36-42  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)618327223  |w (DE-600)2537669-X  |w (DE-576)354444204  |x 2352-8230  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:75  |g year:2010  |g number:1  |g pages:36-42 
776 |i Erscheint auch als  |n Druckausgabe  |w (DE-627)1646398939  |k Non-Electronic 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22116117-90000480  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 2977094857 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1562237357 
LOK |0 005 20170808151648 
LOK |0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a bril 
OAS |a 1  |b inherited from superior work 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL