|
|
|
|
LEADER |
00000caa a22000002 4500 |
001 |
1562258737 |
003 |
DE-627 |
005 |
20220604142842.0 |
007 |
cr uuu---uuuuu |
008 |
170808s2017 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c |
024 |
7 |
|
|a 10.1163/22105700-20171195
|2 doi
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-627)1562258737
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-576)492258732
|
035 |
|
|
|a (DE-599)BSZ492258732
|
040 |
|
|
|a DE-627
|b ger
|c DE-627
|e rakwb
|
041 |
|
|
|a eng
|
084 |
|
|
|a 0
|2 ssgn
|
100 |
1 |
|
|a Braddock, Matthew
|4 aut
|
245 |
1 |
0 |
|a Debunking Arguments from Insensitivity
|
264 |
|
1 |
|c 2017
|
300 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|
336 |
|
|
|a Text
|b txt
|2 rdacontent
|
337 |
|
|
|a Computermedien
|b c
|2 rdamedia
|
338 |
|
|
|a Online-Ressource
|b cr
|2 rdacarrier
|
520 |
|
|
|a Heightened awareness of the origins of our moral judgments pushes many in the direction of moral skepticism, in the direction of thinking we are unjustified in holding our moral judgments on a realist understanding of the moral truths. A classic debunking argument fleshes out this worry: the best explanation of our moral judgments does not appeal to their truth, so we are unjustified in holding our moral judgments. But it is unclear how to get from the explanatory premise to the debunking conclusion. This paper shows how to get from here to there by way of epistemic insensitivity. First, we reconstruct Richard Joyce’s evolutionary debunking argument from insensitivity. Second, we raise epistemological difficulties for Joyce’s argument. Third, we develop and defend a new debunking argument from insensitivity.
|
601 |
|
|
|a Argumentation
|
650 |
|
4 |
|a Evolutionary Debunking Arguments
|x moral skepticism
|x epistemic sensitivity
|x epistemic reliability
|x moral explanations
|x Richard Joyce
|
689 |
0 |
0 |
|d s
|0 (DE-588)4074970-8
|0 (DE-627)106087800
|0 (DE-576)209195908
|2 gnd
|a Moralisches Urteil
|
689 |
0 |
1 |
|d s
|0 (DE-588)4466626-3
|0 (DE-627)233738037
|0 (DE-576)212733788
|2 gnd
|a Moralischer Realismus
|
689 |
0 |
2 |
|d s
|0 (DE-588)4055225-1
|0 (DE-627)104213140
|0 (DE-576)209112794
|2 gnd
|a Skeptizismus
|
689 |
0 |
|
|5 (DE-627)
|
773 |
0 |
8 |
|i In
|t International journal for the study of skepticism
|d Leiden : Brill, 2011
|g 7(2017), 2, Seite 91-113
|h Online-Ressource
|w (DE-627)660812843
|w (DE-600)2610085-X
|w (DE-576)345005341
|x 2210-5700
|7 nnns
|
773 |
1 |
8 |
|g volume:7
|g year:2017
|g number:2
|g pages:91-113
|
856 |
4 |
0 |
|u http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/22105700-20171195
|x Verlag
|3 Volltext
|
935 |
|
|
|a mteo
|
936 |
u |
w |
|d 7
|j 2017
|e 2
|h 91-113
|
951 |
|
|
|a AR
|
ELC |
|
|
|a 1
|
ITA |
|
|
|a 1
|t 1
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 001 2977116427
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 003 DE-627
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 004 1562258737
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 005 20171106095908
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 008 170808||||||||||||||||ger|||||||
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 040
|a DE-Tue135
|c DE-627
|d DE-Tue135
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 092
|o n
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852
|a DE-Tue135
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 852 1
|9 00
|
LOK |
|
|
|0 935
|a bril
|
ORI |
|
|
|a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw
|
REL |
|
|
|a 1
|
STA |
0 |
0 |
|a Moral judgment,Ethical judgment,Moral realism,Scepticism,Scepsis,Skepticism
|
STB |
0 |
0 |
|a Jugement moral,Réalisme moral,Scepticisme
|
STC |
0 |
0 |
|a Escepticismo,Juicio moral,Realismo moral
|
STD |
0 |
0 |
|a Giudizio morale,Realismo morale,Scetticismo
|
STE |
0 |
0 |
|a 怀疑主义,怀疑论,道德判断,道德判定
|
STF |
0 |
0 |
|a 懷疑主義,懷疑論,道德判斷,道德判定
|
STG |
0 |
0 |
|a Ceticismo,Juízo moral,Realismo moral
|
STH |
0 |
0 |
|a Моральное суждение,Моральный реализм,Скептицизм
|
STI |
0 |
0 |
|a Ηθική απόφαση,Ηθικός ρεαλισμός,Σκεπτικισμός
|
SUB |
|
|
|a REL
|
SYG |
0 |
0 |
|a Ethisches Urteil , Skepsis,Skeptik
|