Muslimische Quellen in der Ram Janmabhumi Mandir-Babri Masjid Debatte

During the recent dispute between Hindus and Muslims about their claims to the „Holy Ground“ of the now demolished Babri Masjid both sides cited Muslim sources. The Hindus wanted to prove that in 1528 Babur destroyed a Hindu temple and erected a mosque instead, whereas the Muslim argumentation aimed...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Conermann, Stephan 1964- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:German
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
WorldCat: WorldCat
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Freiburg Institution 1994
In: Internationales Asien-Forum
Year: 1994, Volume: 25, Issue: 3-4, Pages: 269-284
Online Access: Volltext (Verlag)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a2200000 4500
001 1563463962
003 DE-627
005 20240507204623.0
007 cr cn 008aaaaa
008 170913s1994 xx |||||o 00| ||ger c
024 7 |a urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-iaf-15883  |2 urn 
024 7 |a 10.11588/iaf.1994.25.1588  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1563463962 
035 |a (DE-576)493463968 
035 |a (DE-599)BSZ493463968 
035 |a (OCoLC)1341466238 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ger 
084 |a ASIEN  |q DE-16  |2 fid 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)120551195  |0 (DE-627)080742599  |0 (DE-576)170539598  |4 aut  |a Conermann, Stephan  |d 1964- 
109 |a Conermann, Stephan 1964- 
245 1 0 |a Muslimische Quellen in der Ram Janmabhumi Mandir-Babri Masjid Debatte  |c Stephan Conermann 
264 1 |a Freiburg  |b Arnold-Bergstraesser-Institut für Kulturwissenschaftliche Forschung  |c 1994 
264 3 |a Heidelberg  |a Berlin  |b CrossAsia-eJournals  |c 2017 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
500 |a Elektronische Reproduktion der Druckausgabe 
520 |a During the recent dispute between Hindus and Muslims about their claims to the „Holy Ground“ of the now demolished Babri Masjid both sides cited Muslim sources. The Hindus wanted to prove that in 1528 Babur destroyed a Hindu temple and erected a mosque instead, whereas the Muslim argumentation aimed at showing that there was no temple at Ayodhya at this time at all. It seems that a careful study of the main evidence favours the Muslim cause: All Hindu documents are meaningless, because the key manuscript, the , "Sahifa-yi chihal nasaʾh-i Bahadurshahi", has not yet been found, and Mirza Jan’s "Hadiqa-yi shuhada" as well as other works in Urdu are not reliable. When we look at the sources of the Muslims, it becomes evident that the last will of Babur is a hike, but it is true that the destruction of a Hindu temple is not mentioned in the "Babur-nama" nor in the inscriptions of the Babri Masjid, nor in the works of later historians like Abu l- Fazl ʿAllami and Badaʾuni. We have no proof that the territory of the former Babri Masjid „belonged“ to the Muslims nor to the Hindus, but we have a very strong argumentum e silentio that there was no Hindu temple on that site during the reign of Babur. 
583 1 |a Archivierung/Langzeitarchivierung gewährleistet  |x XA-DE-BW  |2 pdager  |5 DE-16-77 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Internationales Asien-Forum  |d Freiburg : Inst., 1970  |g 25(1994), 3-4, Seite 269-284  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)572083599  |w (DE-600)2437429-5  |w (DE-576)284044725  |x 2365-0117  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:1994  |g number:3-4  |g pages:269-284 
856 4 0 |u http://dx.doi.org/10.11588/iaf.1994.25.1588  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://crossasia-journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/iaf/article/view/1588  |x Verlag  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:16-iaf-15883  |x Verlag  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |h SWB  |i ld 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheo_oa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
SUB |a REL