Scientific Naturalism: A Manifesto for Enlightenment Humanism
The success of the Scientific Revolution led to the development of the worldview of scientific naturalism, or the belief that the world is governed by natural laws and forces that can be understood, and that all phenomena are part of nature and can be explained by natural causes, including human cog...
Subtitles: | Issue Theme: Naturalism - Scientific? Religious? Theological? |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Electronic/Print Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Routledge
[2017]
|
In: |
Theology and science
Year: 2017, Volume: 15, Issue: 3, Pages: 220-230 |
RelBib Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism CF Christianity and Science NCA Ethics |
Further subjects: | B
Scientism
B Scientific naturalism B witch crazes B Enlightenment humanism B is-ought fallacy |
Online Access: |
Volltext (doi) |
MARC
LEADER | 00000caa a22000002 4500 | ||
---|---|---|---|
001 | 1564118649 | ||
003 | DE-627 | ||
005 | 20180424141342.0 | ||
007 | tu | ||
008 | 171005s2017 xx ||||| 00| ||eng c | ||
024 | 7 | |a 10.1080/14746700.2017.1335060 |2 doi | |
035 | |a (DE-627)1564118649 | ||
035 | |a (DE-576)494118644 | ||
035 | |a (DE-599)BSZ494118644 | ||
040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
041 | |a eng | ||
084 | |a 0 |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
100 | 1 | |e VerfasserIn |0 (DE-588)115435344 |0 (DE-627)077251369 |0 (DE-576)164919805 |4 aut |a Shermer, Michael |d 1954- | |
109 | |a Shermer, Michael 1954- |a Shermer, Michael B. 1954- |a Shermer, Michael Brant 1954- | ||
245 | 1 | 0 | |a Scientific Naturalism |b A Manifesto for Enlightenment Humanism |c Michael Shermer |
246 | 1 | |i Rubrikentitel |a Issue Theme: Naturalism - Scientific? Religious? Theological? | |
264 | 1 | |c [2017] | |
336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
337 | |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen |b n |2 rdamedia | ||
338 | |a Band |b nc |2 rdacarrier | ||
520 | |a The success of the Scientific Revolution led to the development of the worldview of scientific naturalism, or the belief that the world is governed by natural laws and forces that can be understood, and that all phenomena are part of nature and can be explained by natural causes, including human cognitive, moral and social phenomena. The application of scientific naturalism in the human realm led to the widespread adoption of Enlightenment humanism, a cosmopolitan worldview that places supreme value on science and reason, eschews the supernatural entirely and relies exclusively on nature and nature’s laws, including human nature. | ||
650 | 4 | |a Enlightenment humanism | |
650 | 4 | |a is-ought fallacy | |
650 | 4 | |a Scientific naturalism | |
650 | 4 | |a Scientism | |
650 | 4 | |a witch crazes | |
652 | |a AB:CF:NCA | ||
773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Theology and science |d Abingdon, Oxfordshire : Routledge, 2003 |g 15(2017), 3, Seite 220-230 |w (DE-627)360542654 |w (DE-600)2101143-6 |w (DE-576)105283193 |x 1474-6700 |7 nnns |
773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:15 |g year:2017 |g number:3 |g pages:220-230 |
787 | 0 | 8 | |i Kritik in |a Ellis, George F. R., 1939 - |t Can Science Bridge the Is-Ought gap? |d 2018 |w (DE-627)1572327537 |w (DE-576)502327537 |
856 | |u https://doi.org/10.1080/14746700.2017.1335060 |x doi |3 Volltext | ||
951 | |a AR | ||
ELC | |a 1 |b 1 | ||
ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
LOK | |0 001 2982788918 | ||
LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
LOK | |0 004 1564118649 | ||
LOK | |0 005 20171006102644 | ||
LOK | |0 008 171005||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442042990 |a AB | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 144204389X |a CF | ||
LOK | |0 936ln |0 1442052465 |a NCA | ||
ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||
REL | |a 1 | ||
SUB | |a REL |