Kokkinakis and the Narratives of Proper and Improper Proselytizing
This article explores how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) distinguishes between proper and improper proselytizing. It points out the importance of the competing factual narratives and how the way the facts are presented can determine how the Court responds to the proselytizing activity.
| 1. VerfasserIn: | |
|---|---|
| Medienart: | Elektronisch Aufsatz |
| Sprache: | Englisch |
| Verfügbarkeit prüfen: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Lade...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Veröffentlicht: |
Brill, Nijhoff
2017
|
| In: |
Religion and human rights
Jahr: 2017, Band: 12, Heft: 2/3, Seiten: 99-111 |
| weitere Schlagwörter: | B
Kokkinakis
proselytizing
proselyting
proper proselyting
improper proselytism
European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR)
Article 9
|
| Online Zugang: |
Volltext (Verlag) |
| Zusammenfassung: | This article explores how the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) distinguishes between proper and improper proselytizing. It points out the importance of the competing factual narratives and how the way the facts are presented can determine how the Court responds to the proselytizing activity. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1871-0328 |
| Enthält: | In: Religion and human rights
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/18710328-12231156 |